When screening isn’t supported by evidence

March 1, 2008

Gary Schwitzer: “Bad things can happen when screening recommendations are made for populations for whom there is not clear-cut evidence of benefit. False positive results lead to more testing, more expense, and more anxiety. The additional testing may carry its own potential harms. The more you look, the more you may find some forms of ‘pseudo-disease’ — early hints of possible problems without clear evidence about whether they will go on to create real trouble or not. Many of these people will go on to be inappropriately labeled with “disease” and treated.”



Related posts:

  1. Lung cancer CT screening produces false positives and isn’t ready for prime time
  2. How does cancer screening cause harm?
  3. Not all doctors discuss the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening to patients
  4. How screening for prostate cancer can be a gamble, and why either screening or not has consequences
  5. Is evidence-based medicine desirable?
  6. Op-ed: Not all screening tests lead to early, better treatment
  7. Screening for ovarian cancer redux


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: You’re fired, again

Next post: Demand a CT scan

Site Meter