Gary Schwitzer: “Bad things can happen when screening recommendations are made for populations for whom there is not clear-cut evidence of benefit. False positive results lead to more testing, more expense, and more anxiety. The additional testing may carry its own potential harms. The more you look, the more you may find some forms of ‘pseudo-disease’ — early hints of possible problems without clear evidence about whether they will go on to create real trouble or not. Many of these people will go on to be inappropriately labeled with “disease” and treated.”
Related Stories
- Examining the evidence behind a community health screening
- Why health plans who rate physicians should be supported
- Physical exam evidence and whether it’s still useful
- Participatory medicine and evidence from medical journals
- Patients don’t believe the evidence, blame our healthcare system
- How the quality of the scientific literature impacts the evidence
More in Uncategorized
- Fact or Fiction: ADHD in America, panelist video interviews
- The emotional resistance to admitting error cannot be legislated away
- Is health care shifting towards convenient retail clinics?
- Contraceptive pill prices have a huge price range
- Welcome back, now powered by WordPress and Thesis
- Migrating to WordPress, down for maintenance
Comments
Previous post: You’re fired, again
Next post: Demand a CT scan




