Unintended consequences rears its ugly head again:
Doctors sometimes order a diagnostic test that doesn’t need preauthorization “” even if it provides less-helpful information than the one they prefer “” then seek approval for a more advanced test if the first one shows it’s needed.Worse yet, sometimes patients end up getting a riskier, more invasive test than what they really need, said Hendel. For example, cardiologists wanting to assess blood flow and blockages inside a patient’s heart arteries would prefer a nuclear cardiology test. With that, a small amount of a radioactive substance is injected in the blood and tracked using a camera.
Some doctors will instead order a cardiac catheterization, which doesn’t require advance authorization . . .and carries a 10-times higher risk of complications such as a heart attack or stroke.
Related posts:
- Abdominal compressions
- More Russert analysis
- Patients who underwent radioactive scans are setting off alarms
- Can radiology pre-authorizations lead to turf wars?
- Radiation exposure and x-rays
- Chatty doctors
- How injecting silicone for beauty can kill
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe







Comments on this entry are closed.