Samuel Shubrooks thinks the case was about the money.
Related posts:
- John Ritter and the $67 million malpractice trial
- The overzealous jury, for the defense
- Expert witness with a conscience
- Malpractice defense lawyers: Do they lead physicians astray?
- Malpractice plaintiff wins case, wants more
- John Ritter defendants: "They just lost less"
- A physician is on the hook for a $9M malpractice case
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 1 comment }
“……Dr. Lee is a very competent cardiologist who was being sued for something that was not appropriate…..”
They always say that the lawyers only bring appropriate cases to court. But if the potential dollar reward is big enough, why not roll the dice on a jackpot?
Comments on this entry are closed.