A single-payer compromise?

February 14, 2008

Arnold Kling likes this idea:

If it’s price signals and competition you’re after, why not cut out the middleman and have consumers pay doctors directly? For example, imagine a national healthcare plan that paid 75% of all medical expenses but required you to pay the other 25%. Your maximum out-of-pocket expense each year would be capped at, say, 5% of income at low income levels, 15% in the middle, 30% at the next level, and 50% for the rich.



Related posts:

  1. Administrative costs and single-payer
  2. Single-payer: Will Americans go for the Prius?
  3. Single-payer fanaticism
  4. Single-payer: Does it increase mortality?
  5. Michael Moore an obstacle to single-payer?
  6. The make-believe savings of single-payer
  7. Beware single-payer


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Stop relying on "prevention" to save money

Next post: "The trial lawyer lobby is strong, but ultimately they in are in-the-wrong"

Site Meter