Motives behind CT screening

February 8, 2008

Nice op-ed from Jerome Kassirer on those who push lung cancer screening with CT scans:

How do we know whether these screening recommendations are motivated by concern for patients’ welfare or money, or perhaps both? We don’t. But widespread screening for lung cancer and heart disease can be risky and will be expensive. Experience shows that every time we approve a screening procedure, it is used more widely than the indications for which it was originally approved. More screening machines invariably lead to more tests; more tests yield more false positive results, more risk to screened patients, and more expense.

Stemming evidence-bereft screening modalities needs to be communicated clearly. The public does not yet understand that more tests does not necessarily mean better medicine.

As Dr. Kassirer puts it: “In medicine, not everything that makes sense is sensible.”



Related posts:

  1. 15 cancer screening posts you may have missed
  2. How does cancer screening cause harm?
  3. Lung cancer CT screening produces false positives and isn’t ready for prime time
  4. Prostate cancer screening in blacks, and the lack of balanced information
  5. Screening for ovarian cancer redux
  6. Why health reformers should be worried about the breast cancer screening backlash
  7. The dangers of overscreening


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: "I very much want to die, but our society doesn’t let me"

Next post: Stop giving a crap about yourself?

Site Meter