<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Ritter and the $67 million malpractice trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/02/john-ritter-and-67-million-malpractice.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/02/john-ritter-and-67-million-malpractice.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:19:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/02/john-ritter-and-67-million-malpractice.html/comment-page-1#comment-83734</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/02/john-ritter-and-the-67-million-malpractice-trial.html#comment-83734</guid>
		<description>As a Radiologist, the details of the case are confusing but here are some thoughts.  Chest x-ray is useless.  CT scan could have been done to exclude both PE and dissection at the same time.  I did not read anywhere that one was even ordered.  CT would not have been considered if an MI was the working diagnosis.  What has not been mentioned is that Type A dissections can dissect back into the coronary arteries and block them, causing an acute MI.  Also, all reports I have read state the aorta was not enlarged on the original CT from 2 years prior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Radiologist, the details of the case are confusing but here are some thoughts.  Chest x-ray is useless.  CT scan could have been done to exclude both PE and dissection at the same time.  I did not read anywhere that one was even ordered.  CT would not have been considered if an MI was the working diagnosis.  What has not been mentioned is that Type A dissections can dissect back into the coronary arteries and block them, causing an acute MI.  Also, all reports I have read state the aorta was not enlarged on the original CT from 2 years prior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/02/john-ritter-and-67-million-malpractice.html/comment-page-1#comment-83373</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/02/john-ritter-and-the-67-million-malpractice-trial.html#comment-83373</guid>
		<description>Jackpot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackpot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/02/john-ritter-and-67-million-malpractice.html/comment-page-1#comment-83366</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/02/john-ritter-and-the-67-million-malpractice-trial.html#comment-83366</guid>
		<description>The end of the article states that the family will use the proceeds to educate the public about aortic dissection.  Hmmm.  Educate the public about a rare condition that has a poor survival and no screening tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end of the article states that the family will use the proceeds to educate the public about aortic dissection.  Hmmm.  Educate the public about a rare condition that has a poor survival and no screening tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
