<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: A co-pay . . . in Quebec?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/02/co-pay-in-quebec.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/02/co-pay-in-quebec.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Health Punk</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/02/co-pay-in-quebec.html#comment-83793</link> <dc:creator>Health Punk</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/02/a-co-pay-in-quebec.html#comment-83793</guid> <description>It&#039;s about time.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The problem with the Canadian systems (they&#039;re slightly different by province) is that there is TOO LITTLE management and rationing.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Single payer, but insufficient efforts to manage demand and access lead to overutilization.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, the copay is good not because the amount will make a substantial difference, but rather because it will make people be more judicious about their use of the system.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am, however, surprised at the $25 amount.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In any case, some type of copay, combined with community case management and disease management strategies will make a significant impact in their system.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(FYI...I&#039;ve consulted with one provincial government on strategies to manage costs and quality.  There&#039;s opportunity, and they also start from a better place than we do in the US.)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time.</p><p>The problem with the Canadian systems (they&#8217;re slightly different by province) is that there is TOO LITTLE management and rationing.</p><p>Single payer, but insufficient efforts to manage demand and access lead to overutilization.</p><p>So, the copay is good not because the amount will make a substantial difference, but rather because it will make people be more judicious about their use of the system.</p><p>I am, however, surprised at the $25 amount.</p><p>In any case, some type of copay, combined with community case management and disease management strategies will make a significant impact in their system.</p><p>(FYI&#8230;I&#8217;ve consulted with one provincial government on strategies to manage costs and quality.  There&#8217;s opportunity, and they also start from a better place than we do in the US.)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 345/349 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 09:46:58 -->
