<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Pete Stark dares physicians to drop Medicare</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html#comment-83651</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop-medicare.html#comment-83651</guid> <description>Consider the medical insurance Congress provides for itself (surprise! Not Medicare) and the yearly increasing (illegally according to the Constitution) pay raises. And all of this they get the rest of their lives, by golly. There won&#039;t be a single Congress retiree begging for a doctor who takes Medicare patients. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But, we get what we vote for, and we had better not forget it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider the medical insurance Congress provides for itself (surprise! Not Medicare) and the yearly increasing (illegally according to the Constitution) pay raises. And all of this they get the rest of their lives, by golly. There won&#8217;t be a single Congress retiree begging for a doctor who takes Medicare patients.</p><p>But, we get what we vote for, and we had better not forget it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ObGynThoughts</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html#comment-83393</link> <dc:creator>ObGynThoughts</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop-medicare.html#comment-83393</guid> <description>Oh, Mr Stark, as an ObGyn I am profoundly scared of dropping Medicare! As are my pediatric colleagues. And I even have a plan to  drop more third party payers, to be exact, all those who pay me less than it&#039;s worth. &lt;br/&gt;Referrals from PCPs may change, but my practice and my life will be a lot easier and more fulfilling</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Mr Stark, as an ObGyn I am profoundly scared of dropping Medicare! As are my pediatric colleagues. And I even have a plan to  drop more third party payers, to be exact, all those who pay me less than it&#8217;s worth. <br />Referrals from PCPs may change, but my practice and my life will be a lot easier and more fulfilling</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html#comment-83358</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop-medicare.html#comment-83358</guid> <description>My inlaws just moved to Dallas.  The doctor I see will not take any new Medicare patents.  Note they have company retirement medical but that is secondary to medicare.  This is the case for ALL retirees who are elgible for medicare.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My inlaws just moved to Dallas.  The doctor I see will not take any new Medicare patents.  Note they have company retirement medical but that is secondary to medicare.  This is the case for ALL retirees who are elgible for medicare.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html#comment-83188</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop-medicare.html#comment-83188</guid> <description>One of the largest multispecialty medical groups in Houston, Kelsey-Seybold, is no longer accepting new Medicare patients (http://www.kelsey-seybold.com/Insurance_Accepted/InsuranceAccepted.cfm).    Their slogan is &quot;Your Doctors For Life&quot;. Get a clue, doctors ARE opting  out and access IS becoming more limited.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the largest multispecialty medical groups in Houston, Kelsey-Seybold, is no longer accepting new Medicare patients (<a href="http://www.kelsey-seybold.com/Insurance_Accepted/InsuranceAccepted.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.kelsey-seybold.com/Insurance_Accepted/InsuranceAccepted.cfm</a>).    Their slogan is &#8220;Your Doctors For Life&#8221;. Get a clue, doctors ARE opting  out and access IS becoming more limited.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html#comment-83180</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop-medicare.html#comment-83180</guid> <description>Everett (WA) Clinic, and Polyclinic in Seattle started limiting their Medicare patients:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://tinyurl.com/378vwq&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Corvallis (OR) clinic limits Medicare:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://tinyurl.com/3942xp&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;also covered here on this blog in 2007. And that&#039;s just the Northwest. It&#039;s already happening.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Of course, this just shows the profound ignorance of Pete Stark.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everett (WA) Clinic, and Polyclinic in Seattle started limiting their Medicare patients:</p><p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/378vwq" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/378vwq</a></p><p>Corvallis (OR) clinic limits Medicare:</p><p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3942xp" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3942xp</a></p><p>also covered here on this blog in 2007. And that&#8217;s just the Northwest. It&#8217;s already happening.</p><p>Of course, this just shows the profound ignorance of Pete Stark.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Happyman</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html#comment-83171</link> <dc:creator>Happyman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop-medicare.html#comment-83171</guid> <description>&quot;US residency programs don&#039;t accept FMGs in large numbers. I stand by my point to policymakers: you won&#039;t replace recalcitrant surgical specialists with FMGs.&lt;br/&gt;&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That is pure BS. I trained in one of the largest teaching hospitals in NYC, something like 100 residents/year across all specialties. And probably 60% were FMG&#039;s. Not just in Internal Medicine, but also in general surgery, ob/gyn, psych, neuro, ortho, &amp; urology. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Granted it was slanted towards internal med, but then those grads funneled in to the IM subspecialties: cardiol, GI, heme-onc, etc. were almost exclusively FMGs. And they were about the brightest trainees in the hospital.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And as far as specialists&#039; cherry-picking, most internists maintain a relationship with a VERY SMALL group of specialists, so it&#039;s quick &amp; easy to refer when necessary. So the cardiologist or GI who refuses insurance X generally gets crossed off the list quickly, in favor of someone who makes the PCPs life easier.  After all, for them to see a medicare patient on a &quot;referral&quot; basis versus without a referral increases their reimbursement dramatically (you knew that, right?)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Those specialists that had any inkling of superiority are generally blackballed from referrals by the IM community in my hospital, and are starving for business. In my area there is a tremendous surplus of certain specialties (4 dermatologists &amp; at least 6 ophthalmologists in my building), versus about 5 internists taking new patients.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;US residency programs don&#8217;t accept FMGs in large numbers. I stand by my point to policymakers: you won&#8217;t replace recalcitrant surgical specialists with FMGs.<br />&#8220;</p><p>That is pure BS. I trained in one of the largest teaching hospitals in NYC, something like 100 residents/year across all specialties. And probably 60% were FMG&#8217;s. Not just in Internal Medicine, but also in general surgery, ob/gyn, psych, neuro, ortho, &#038; urology.</p><p>Granted it was slanted towards internal med, but then those grads funneled in to the IM subspecialties: cardiol, GI, heme-onc, etc. were almost exclusively FMGs. And they were about the brightest trainees in the hospital.</p><p>And as far as specialists&#8217; cherry-picking, most internists maintain a relationship with a VERY SMALL group of specialists, so it&#8217;s quick &#038; easy to refer when necessary. So the cardiologist or GI who refuses insurance X generally gets crossed off the list quickly, in favor of someone who makes the PCPs life easier.  After all, for them to see a medicare patient on a &#8220;referral&#8221; basis versus without a referral increases their reimbursement dramatically (you knew that, right?)</p><p>Those specialists that had any inkling of superiority are generally blackballed from referrals by the IM community in my hospital, and are starving for business. In my area there is a tremendous surplus of certain specialties (4 dermatologists &#038; at least 6 ophthalmologists in my building), versus about 5 internists taking new patients.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html#comment-83169</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:10:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop-medicare.html#comment-83169</guid> <description>Many physicians are not in the financial position due to &quot;keeping up with Dr. Jones&quot;, nor do they have the business sense to bail on Medicare and have the same standard of living.  Stark is right.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many physicians are not in the financial position due to &#8220;keeping up with Dr. Jones&#8221;, nor do they have the business sense to bail on Medicare and have the same standard of living.  Stark is right.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html#comment-83165</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop-medicare.html#comment-83165</guid> <description>No offense intended to FMGs.  But the fact is that you can&#039;t be board certified in this country without a US residency. And the US residency programs don&#039;t accept FMGs in large numbers.  I stand by my point to policymakers:  you won&#039;t replace recalcitrant surgical specialists with FMGs.&lt;br/&gt;Also, I agree that  &quot;we&#039;re all in this together&quot;, but if you aren&#039;t aware of the class envy tone of this blog, you haven&#039;t been here very long. We get quite a few pokes from Kevin, and it gets a little old.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense intended to FMGs.  But the fact is that you can&#8217;t be board certified in this country without a US residency. And the US residency programs don&#8217;t accept FMGs in large numbers.  I stand by my point to policymakers:  you won&#8217;t replace recalcitrant surgical specialists with FMGs.<br />Also, I agree that  &#8220;we&#8217;re all in this together&#8221;, but if you aren&#8217;t aware of the class envy tone of this blog, you haven&#8217;t been here very long. We get quite a few pokes from Kevin, and it gets a little old.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html#comment-83159</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop-medicare.html#comment-83159</guid> <description>Have you guys considered that people like Stark, inside the beltway for a generation and drunk on the power and privilege, isn&#039;t worried one little bit if you do drop Medicare, because he would love the excuse to simple legislate that you HAVE to take it?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you guys considered that people like Stark, inside the beltway for a generation and drunk on the power and privilege, isn&#8217;t worried one little bit if you do drop Medicare, because he would love the excuse to simple legislate that you HAVE to take it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop.html#comment-83143</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2008/01/pete-stark-dares-physicians-to-drop-medicare.html#comment-83143</guid> <description>Though I agree with much of what you have to say anon 8:45 your swipe at PCP&#039;s is uncalled for (editorial comment: I am a medical subspecialist)&lt;br/&gt;re:  &quot;There is a lot of hand-wringing on the part of the PCPs on the blog about how the specialists are cheating them out of their Medicare fair share. That is pure BS&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The fallacy is you can and do refuse medicaid pt&#039;s and shortly medicare. With the exception of the boutique docs most PCP&#039;s don&#039;t easily have that luxury. The payment scale hurts us all. However, it is killing the PCP&#039;s at the bottom of the payment ladder. Also as you well know most insurance key&#039;s off of some variation of medicare rates. Again the same result. Also do you referrals come out of thin air? My don&#039;t. I have relationships with PCP&#039;s. I take their medicare not just because of the patient&#039;s (and I agree I definitely like seeing the appreciative members of the depression/WWII generation more than &quot;some&quot; of the self-entitled prebaby boomers), but because they make the other referrals to me. I understand that these primary docs are in a bind with subspecialist coverage. We are collegues after all right? Additionally, depending on your insurance contracts you might want to think long and hard about &quot;refusing&quot; medicare, as I have seen PCP&#039;s just stop sending all patient&#039;s to subspeicalist&#039;s who start cherry picking. Food for thought. Pete Stark is a jackass who has no clue as to what is really going on in medicine. If the other members of congress follow suit with his line of thought then they all will have a shock in June. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;PS: About FMG&#039;s, some of the brightest docs I have ever met were &quot;FMG&#039;s&quot;. They have already been self-selected by getting in to this country in the first place...get over yourself.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I agree with much of what you have to say anon 8:45 your swipe at PCP&#8217;s is uncalled for (editorial comment: I am a medical subspecialist)<br />re:  &#8220;There is a lot of hand-wringing on the part of the PCPs on the blog about how the specialists are cheating them out of their Medicare fair share. That is pure BS&#8221;</p><p>The fallacy is you can and do refuse medicaid pt&#8217;s and shortly medicare. With the exception of the boutique docs most PCP&#8217;s don&#8217;t easily have that luxury. The payment scale hurts us all. However, it is killing the PCP&#8217;s at the bottom of the payment ladder. Also as you well know most insurance key&#8217;s off of some variation of medicare rates. Again the same result. Also do you referrals come out of thin air? My don&#8217;t. I have relationships with PCP&#8217;s. I take their medicare not just because of the patient&#8217;s (and I agree I definitely like seeing the appreciative members of the depression/WWII generation more than &#8220;some&#8221; of the self-entitled prebaby boomers), but because they make the other referrals to me. I understand that these primary docs are in a bind with subspecialist coverage. We are collegues after all right? Additionally, depending on your insurance contracts you might want to think long and hard about &#8220;refusing&#8221; medicare, as I have seen PCP&#8217;s just stop sending all patient&#8217;s to subspeicalist&#8217;s who start cherry picking. Food for thought. Pete Stark is a jackass who has no clue as to what is really going on in medicine. If the other members of congress follow suit with his line of thought then they all will have a shock in June.</p><p>PS: About FMG&#8217;s, some of the brightest docs I have ever met were &#8220;FMG&#8217;s&#8221;. They have already been self-selected by getting in to this country in the first place&#8230;get over yourself.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 440/444 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 16:24:47 -->
