Medical journals and trolling for potential plaintiffs

December 4, 2007

To no one’s surprise, the internet and medical studies have helped lawyers find potential plaintiffs:

Using an advanced Google search strategy, we determined the number of Internet “hits” for websites soliciting plaintiffs for medicolegal action before and after publication of a study that highlighted the risk of dysglycemia among patients taking the antibiotic gatifloxacin. We found that early online release and print publication were associated with an immediate and sustained increase in the number of websites soliciting plaintiffs for legal action.

(via Dr. RW)



Related posts:

  1. Should medical journals use the term nauseous, nauseated, or nauseating?
  2. Do you miss old-fashioned journals at the medical library?
  3. The internet disconnect
  4. Political crushing of dissent at the medical journals
  5. Googling the diagnosis – touching off a firestorm
  6. Pfizer versus the medical journals
  7. Medical-legal illustration


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Medicare and single-payer

Next post: Bob Wachter on his Imus interview

Site Meter