Charlie Baker asks “What’s the alternative?” to our current tort-based malpractice system.
No-fault insurance, arbitration, health courts, and global medical standards would be four things off the top of my head that would be better than what we have now.
Related posts:
- If health reformers want to emulate Canada and Europe, can we copy their malpractice systems too?
- Will reforming the malpractice system be a deal breaker for health reform?
- Health courts, and how they can save our health care system
- A cost effectiveness institute
- Can the Massachusetts health reform plan be replicated nationally?
- Doctors and lawyers agree on a malpractice bill
- A doctor decides to insure himself for malpractice
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 1 comment }
Simply saying those things would be better doesn’t mean much. HOW would they be better? Cheaper? Quicker? What?
Comments on this entry are closed.