Universal health care hits a speed bump in San Fransisco…
Judge White ruled that the employer assessment violates the federal ERISA law (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) which, among other things, prohibits state and local governments from mandating that employers must provide health insurance to their workers. ERISA was the federal law cited by Maryland and New York federal courts in overturning so-called Wal-Mart laws passed last year to require very large employers to cover their workers or pay a tax.
Related posts:
- Universal coverage without primary care
- Universal coverage will fail without fixing primary care first
- Health care in Nevada
- Universal coverage and primary care
- Will the lack of primary care doctors make universal coverage useless?
- Universal coverage without primary care access is useless
- Can universal health coverage be sustained long-term?
KevinMD.com on Facebook
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe







Comments on this entry are closed.