With physicians facing a 10% cut in Medicare reimbursement, I would like to reprint my op-ed published on August 2007 in the New Hampshire Union Leader.
Monday, Aug. 6, 2007
MEDICARE is planning to cut physician payment rates by 10 percent in 2008. These reductions will continue annually, and it is predicted that the total cuts will be about 40 percent by 2016.
The topic of physician compensation generally elicits little public sympathy. After all, the average primary care physician salary in 2006 was about $150,000. Who are we to complain about reimbursement? As you will see, however, cuts in physician Medicare payments affect everyone.
Medical practices today essentially function as small businesses. Physicians are responsible for expenses like rent, payroll, employee health insurance and malpractice insurance. These costs are expected to increase 20 percent in the next nine years. During this same time, physician Medicare payments are faced with cuts of 40 percent. Already, some practices lose money every time a Medicare patient is seen. Some may find the link between medicine and money distasteful, but the hard truth is that it is impossible to practice medicine in a business model that is headed for financial disaster.
At a time when baby boomers are approaching the age of 65, some physicians attuned to this economic reality have simply stopped accepting Medicare patients. According to a recent survey by the American Medical Association, 60 percent reported that they would have to limit the number of new Medicare patients they treat due to next year’s cut. Half would reduce their staff. Fourteen percent would “completely get out of patient care.” Some seniors are already faced with calling 20 to 30 providers in the desperate hope that someone will accept Medicare.
It is unlikely that the primary care shortage will improve in the near future, as Medicare reimbursement rates continue to be a primary driver of physician salary. In a report by the Center for Studying Health System Change, incomes of primary care physicians fared amongst the worst in keeping pace with inflation between 1995 and 2003, while medical specialists fared the best.
Medical students, already burdened with an average debt in excess of $100,000, are clearly gravitating towards specialties where salaries have better kept pace with inflation. The report concludes that with “the diverging income trends between these specialties and primary care, the result is likely to be an imbalance in the physician workforce and perhaps a future shortage of primary care physicians.”
Some may be wondering if this is just a “Medicare problem.” Should you care if you have private insurance?
Absolutely. With primary care being the backbone of every health system, patients cannot have their chronic medical issues addressed in a timely fashion with a lack of primary care access. In delaying care, chronic diseases blossom into more serious conditions that are forced to be seen in already overcrowded emergency rooms.
Hospital-based care is often the most expensive and the corresponding rise in health care costs plays a major role in the increase of health insurance premiums. Unfortunately, the government responds to rising health care costs by further reducing physician payments and the cycle continues to spiral out of control.
You will hear physicians rallying against the Medicare fee reductions in the coming year. Think about how this affects you. Contact your government representative and do your part to break this vicious cycle.
Related posts:
- Classic post: Cut Medicare payments for doctors, you’ll have fewer doctors
- Op-ed: Cut Medicare payments for doctors, you’ll have fewer doctors
- Charging patients for Medicare cuts
- Medicare cuts: A 6-month stay of execution
- Medicare cuts: Let the games begin
- Medicare cuts: "In an avalanche, no snowflake feels responsible"
- Medicare cuts: This politician gets it
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe







{ 5 comments }
And fewer doctors is a BAD thing? Remember outcomes (in statistical average) are WORSE or at least no better in areas of the country with more doctors–as the Dartmouth studies repeatedly show.
Doctors kill. We should have fewer of them.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/10/opinion/10goodman.html?ex=1310184000&en=5dc29d987e668bc4&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Providers can rail all they wish in the upcoming year. The rest of us that pay taxes have, at some point, to say enough is enough with the Medicare provider gravy train. Between the boondoggles known as Medicare and Social(ist) Security there has to be a limit placed upon the perfidy put upon the taxpayers. If such programs can not be axed in their entirety, then the least that can be done is to roll them back.
~Criminallopath~
dear anon 9:34 I think you may be making kevin’s point regarding primary care. Areas with MORE Doctors are areas of MORE specialists that lead to fractured non-continuous care that is worse. The doctors in underserved areas are usually disproportionally primary care. I really think to say “and fewer doctors is a BAD thing?” shows your bias without thinking thru the factors that make “more doctors are no better” We just have the wrong mix of doctors.
Yeah, the more medicare starts to get out of hand, the more people are shut out of what they really need. Many elderly people on fixed incomes have to deal with these increasing premiums, and this all happens when???? At the point in their life when they need medical attention the most.. What do the health care companies do while this is happening? They sit back and collect the money.. This is why
AARP has set up http:// http://www.thisissoridiculous.com so that we can sign a petition to make our voice heard. They also have updated news, video and while your there you can e-mail your congressman to let him know how you feel! Medicare is an important issue in the US right now, and we really need to be heard on this, or it’s just going to get more and more out of hand!
“We just have the wrong mix of doctors.
# posted by Anonymous : 5:58 PM”
We have MDs who want big bucks and should have gone to business school instead of med school.
Comments on this entry are closed.