<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pfizer&#8217;s pipeline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/10/pfizers-pipeline.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/10/pfizers-pipeline.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:50:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RJS</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/10/pfizers-pipeline.html/comment-page-1#comment-81054</link>
		<dc:creator>RJS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/10/pfizers-pipeline.html#comment-81054</guid>
		<description>Dr Schoor, they&#039;re already trying this crap with Caduet. Granted, Lipitor is still patent-protected, but it&#039;s clear they&#039;re thinking along the same lines. Torcetrapib was going to be their lifesaver. No more, I guess.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(Incidentally, Sanofi-Aventis has just done something similar with &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://onthepharm.net/2007/10/levocetirizine-pointless-drug.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Xyzal&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The very definition of &quot;lame&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I would be crapping my pants if I were the CEO of a big drug company right now. They&#039;ve spent so much time and effort evergreening existing products that they&#039;ve forgotten that basic research is the best way to make serious money. And that doing it effectively requires lots of &lt;i&gt;time&lt;/i&gt;. Even companies with &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://onthepharm.net/2007/04/how-sepracor-could-make-a-buttload-of-money.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a product that&#039;s actually better than the competition&lt;/a&gt; are undercapitalizing on their opportunities. It&#039;s the height of folly.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I see a big crash in Big Pharma&#039;s collective stock prices in the near future. It&#039;s too late to effect a pipeline turnaround unless they buy a pre-existing company&#039;s IP portfolio. And there just aren&#039;t that many companies with much in the way of promising new drug therapies that can be bought out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Schoor, they&#8217;re already trying this crap with Caduet. Granted, Lipitor is still patent-protected, but it&#8217;s clear they&#8217;re thinking along the same lines. Torcetrapib was going to be their lifesaver. No more, I guess.</p>
<p>(Incidentally, Sanofi-Aventis has just done something similar with <a HREF="http://onthepharm.net/2007/10/levocetirizine-pointless-drug.html" REL="nofollow">Xyzal</a>.)</p>
<p>The very definition of &#8220;lame&#8221;.</p>
<p>I would be crapping my pants if I were the CEO of a big drug company right now. They&#8217;ve spent so much time and effort evergreening existing products that they&#8217;ve forgotten that basic research is the best way to make serious money. And that doing it effectively requires lots of <i>time</i>. Even companies with <a HREF="http://onthepharm.net/2007/04/how-sepracor-could-make-a-buttload-of-money.html" REL="nofollow">a product that&#8217;s actually better than the competition</a> are undercapitalizing on their opportunities. It&#8217;s the height of folly.</p>
<p>I see a big crash in Big Pharma&#8217;s collective stock prices in the near future. It&#8217;s too late to effect a pipeline turnaround unless they buy a pre-existing company&#8217;s IP portfolio. And there just aren&#8217;t that many companies with much in the way of promising new drug therapies that can be bought out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Independent Urologist</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/10/pfizers-pipeline.html/comment-page-1#comment-81028</link>
		<dc:creator>The Independent Urologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/10/pfizers-pipeline.html#comment-81028</guid>
		<description>Here is the solution.  Engineer an enantiomer of an existing drug like detrol LA, and re-patent it.  Then market this &quot;new&quot; drug as a breakthough drug for over active bladder.  Problem: solved.  Alternatively they can combine 2 off-patent drugs, such as a detrol-hytrin combo drug, and sell this as a breakthrough agent. Perhaps they can call it Prostaspaz.  With some marketing and FDA pay-outs, voila, a new blockbuster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the solution.  Engineer an enantiomer of an existing drug like detrol LA, and re-patent it.  Then market this &#8220;new&#8221; drug as a breakthough drug for over active bladder.  Problem: solved.  Alternatively they can combine 2 off-patent drugs, such as a detrol-hytrin combo drug, and sell this as a breakthrough agent. Perhaps they can call it Prostaspaz.  With some marketing and FDA pay-outs, voila, a new blockbuster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Independent Urologist</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/10/pfizers-pipeline.html/comment-page-1#comment-81027</link>
		<dc:creator>The Independent Urologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/10/pfizers-pipeline.html#comment-81027</guid>
		<description>They can always make an enantiomer of, say, detrol, and re-market it as a breakthrough new drug for overactive bladder. Worked for Astra-Zeneca and Nexium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can always make an enantiomer of, say, detrol, and re-market it as a breakthrough new drug for overactive bladder. Worked for Astra-Zeneca and Nexium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
