EMRs and ROI

October 9, 2007

Don’t expect much of a revenue boost. Any wonder why EMRs are so slow to spread?

One way to objectively measure value is return on investment (ROI). The news our survey delivers on this front isn’t particularly good. For every two respondents who say they have earned back in efficiency and revenue what they invested in an EMR, three say they have not. That’s despite the large number of survey participants who were able to reduce or reassign staff.



Related posts:

  1. Would you rather have Gregory House or Marcus Welby as your doctor?
  2. Are poor products to blame for the slow adoption of EMRs?
  3. EMRs: Not ready for prime time?
  4. The real scoop on EMRs
  5. Will universal health care lead to a physician shortage?
  6. Are physicians overtreating?
  7. Data entry in EMRs, and why doctors are slow to adopt information technology


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Even physician assistants are dissing primary care

Next post: HIPAA strikes back

Site Meter