Are mid-levels being misused?

October 17, 2007

Yes in some cases, says Dominic Carone:

Where I have a problem is when patients are unknowingly and essentially forced to see a physician’s assistant or a nurse practitioner. What do I mean by “forced?” Well, take the example of a patient who waits for months for a doctor appointment. The patient shows up and after waiting for a long time because the office is double-booked, is then told that he or she will be seeing the physician assistant or nurse practitioner.



Related posts:

  1. Bait and switch
  2. Do mid-levels want to take over primary care?
  3. Medical records and accuracy
  4. How are residents supposed to learn?
  5. My take: Mid-levels, health consultants, blogging
  6. When do mid-levels help in the ER?
  7. My take: Mid-levels, PCP summit


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 comment }

1 Anonymous October 17, 2007 at 9:17 pm

Mid-levels are being misused when they are used to make the physicians work loard manageable and predictable by haveing the mid-level take care of the urgent and more acute matters. Lives have been lost becuase of this.

In outpatient clinics mid-levels should be used for the rountine algorithym driven follow-ups while the urgent visits and people with unknown diagnoses should be seen by the people best trained to detect the serious cases.

In inpatient settings mid-levels should be used to manage discharge planning and following up on results–not the initial H & P or eval where subtle advantages in training in clinical diagnostic evaluation can make all the difference in the world.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Older physicians: "Looking for a ticket out"

Next post: VA cuts out Avandia

Site Meter