<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There is no cure for HIV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/09/there-is-no-cure-for-hiv.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/09/there-is-no-cure-for-hiv.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:59:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/09/there-is-no-cure-for-hiv.html/comment-page-1#comment-80344</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/09/there-is-no-cure-for-hiv.html#comment-80344</guid>
		<description>The change in attitude by the gay community toward HIV has undoubtedly contributed to the spread of disease.  &lt;br/&gt;The other big contributor that is the elephant in the room that no epidemiologist would ever get caught acknowledging publically is how treatment has increased the total burden of disease.  That is, if one uses the standard epidemiologic models of transmission for HIV, and substitutes zero efficacy (i.e. no drug therapy) during the 90&#039;s the case fatality rate goes up (people with the disease die sooner), but the total mortality goes down (less people die).  This seeming paradox comes about when those who can transmit the disease, and do so at a substantial rate, are removed from the population faster rather than slower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The change in attitude by the gay community toward HIV has undoubtedly contributed to the spread of disease.  <br />The other big contributor that is the elephant in the room that no epidemiologist would ever get caught acknowledging publically is how treatment has increased the total burden of disease.  That is, if one uses the standard epidemiologic models of transmission for HIV, and substitutes zero efficacy (i.e. no drug therapy) during the 90&#8217;s the case fatality rate goes up (people with the disease die sooner), but the total mortality goes down (less people die).  This seeming paradox comes about when those who can transmit the disease, and do so at a substantial rate, are removed from the population faster rather than slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/09/there-is-no-cure-for-hiv.html/comment-page-1#comment-80301</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/09/there-is-no-cure-for-hiv.html#comment-80301</guid>
		<description>That is one pretty big assumption to make...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one pretty big assumption to make&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
