Quit smoking, or no surgery

September 14, 2007

Doctors in the UK refuse to fix a patient’s broken ankle until he quits smoking:

John Nuttall, 57, needs surgery to set the ankle which he broke in three places two years ago because it did not mend naturally with a plaster cast.

Doctors at the Royal Cornwall Hospital in Truro have refused to operate because they say his heavy smoking would reduce the chance of healing, and there is a risk of complications which could lead to amputation.



Related posts:

  1. Do we really want Obama to quit smoking?
  2. What happens if you quit smoking right now?
  3. Should smokers be refused surgery?
  4. Can doctors be sued for not getting their patients to quit smoking?
  5. Should movies receive an R-rating for having smoking scenes?
  6. Tell patients to stop smoking, or get sued
  7. Ban smoking and watch the rate of heart attacks drop


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 5 comments }

1 Anonymous September 14, 2007 at 5:28 pm

In the US he could have had the thing fixed in the first place and he wouldn’t have needed a fusion. No one treats trimalleolar ankle fractures nonoperatively here in the states. Socialized medicine gives you a cast and a slap on the back.

2 Alison Cummins September 14, 2007 at 6:21 pm

anonymous 5:58,

If you’d read the article, he refused operative treatment at the time because he was afraid of MRSA.

3 Anonymous September 14, 2007 at 8:17 pm

It would be nice if the patient would take some responsibility for his poor decision making.

He chose to smoke for 40 years. He chose to forego necessary surgery. He should make quitting smoking the utmost priority in order to have this elective surgery. There is a strong possibility of complication, given the man’s risk factors. He would be the first one to sue if his leg healed poorly post-operatively, once again, attempting to evade responsibility for poor decision-making.

4 miss-elaine-ious September 15, 2007 at 1:21 am

I don’t think this is a case of socialized versus unsocialized medicine. I think this is a case of risk versus benefit. Surgery for this man may not even work because of how nicotine can harm the healing process. Even in the US there would probably be surgeons saying no to the surgery.

5 Hatin' on cigarettes September 15, 2007 at 11:56 am

They should offer him Chantix to aid him in quitting. He’s an addict relying on cigarettes to control his mood and stress levels.

He needs the surgery. There is no reason they should not demand he stop smoking and quit until he is healed, as requisite for surgery.

But they should offer assistance in dealing with his addiction, too.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: 20/20: Sick in America

Next post: Stossel’s "Sick in America": Blogosphere reaction

Site Meter