<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Physicians Sue Missouri Over Midwifery Law</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Happyman</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html#comment-78867</link> <dc:creator>Happyman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery-law.html#comment-78867</guid> <description>yet another reason for boarded obstetricians (ie. MDs) to stop delivering babies &amp; practice GYN only; and to be able to divorce oneself from the hospital and their requirements for unreimbursed on-call duties, etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yet another reason for boarded obstetricians (ie. MDs) to stop delivering babies &#038; practice GYN only; and to be able to divorce oneself from the hospital and their requirements for unreimbursed on-call duties, etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html#comment-78827</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery-law.html#comment-78827</guid> <description>If you could really say, (for the sake of argument) let them die in labor, or somehow be able to hand off the duty to someone else, I&#039;m not taking on the patient&#039;s care, I suppose the malpractice rates would go up.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In reality, the obstetricians are FORCED to take on the patients as a condition of medical staff appointment. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So the midwife with the complication turns over the patient to the hospital, and the unlicky obstetrician on duty that day inherits the risk.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Having seen many such cases over the years, the midwife always skates off responsibility. The patient has been fed the anti-doctor line, to even be in the doctor&#039;s care is sort of an insult to them, the midwife does not see any responsibility.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And heck, I&#039;m in primary care. And even I&#039;ve seen this. The other thing with mid-levels is the request for &quot;co-management&quot; and &quot;collaboration&quot; which really means when there&#039;s trouble, the response is &quot;I&#039;m just the nurse&quot; and the search is on for a doctor to take the blame.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you could really say, (for the sake of argument) let them die in labor, or somehow be able to hand off the duty to someone else, I&#8217;m not taking on the patient&#8217;s care, I suppose the malpractice rates would go up.</p><p>In reality, the obstetricians are FORCED to take on the patients as a condition of medical staff appointment.</p><p>So the midwife with the complication turns over the patient to the hospital, and the unlicky obstetrician on duty that day inherits the risk.</p><p>Having seen many such cases over the years, the midwife always skates off responsibility. The patient has been fed the anti-doctor line, to even be in the doctor&#8217;s care is sort of an insult to them, the midwife does not see any responsibility.</p><p>And heck, I&#8217;m in primary care. And even I&#8217;ve seen this. The other thing with mid-levels is the request for &#8220;co-management&#8221; and &#8220;collaboration&#8221; which really means when there&#8217;s trouble, the response is &#8220;I&#8217;m just the nurse&#8221; and the search is on for a doctor to take the blame.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html#comment-78807</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery-law.html#comment-78807</guid> <description>to: let em taste our pain: &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You are right on the money!  Midwives probably have a unfair advantage when it comes to malpractice insurance because the physicians backing them up probably take the heat most of the time for bad outcomes, I would suspect.  So as you say, if they can now practice without supervision, their malpractice rates would likely go up, thus leveling the playing field a little.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to: let em taste our pain:</p><p>You are right on the money!  Midwives probably have a unfair advantage when it comes to malpractice insurance because the physicians backing them up probably take the heat most of the time for bad outcomes, I would suspect.  So as you say, if they can now practice without supervision, their malpractice rates would likely go up, thus leveling the playing field a little.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html#comment-78802</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery-law.html#comment-78802</guid> <description>Anon 6:17, fdont confuse them with facts or obviosu statistical points. These guys just believe whatever they want to believe.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Kevin has already posted a wealth of articles about why C section rates are up.. hello, anybody say &quot;John Edwards&quot;??  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And to the midwife who posted... if you take the VAST MAJORITY of pregnancies, and hand them to midwives, then where in the world do you think you can procure a vast number o OB&#039;s from??? What would we need them for. But oops, if there&#039;s ashortage, I guess we&#039;ll just have to suck it up.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Why doesn&#039;t anyone come to their senses about this midlevel stuff already?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon 6:17, fdont confuse them with facts or obviosu statistical points. These guys just believe whatever they want to believe.</p><p>Kevin has already posted a wealth of articles about why C section rates are up.. hello, anybody say &#8220;John Edwards&#8221;??</p><p>And to the midwife who posted&#8230; if you take the VAST MAJORITY of pregnancies, and hand them to midwives, then where in the world do you think you can procure a vast number o OB&#8217;s from??? What would we need them for. But oops, if there&#8217;s ashortage, I guess we&#8217;ll just have to suck it up.</p><p>Why doesn&#8217;t anyone come to their senses about this midlevel stuff already?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html#comment-78796</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery-law.html#comment-78796</guid> <description>The obvious point missed over the outcome studies is the complicated pregnancy is transferred to a real obstetrician, and the OB/GYN statistically inherits the bad outcome.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The obvious point missed over the outcome studies is the complicated pregnancy is transferred to a real obstetrician, and the OB/GYN statistically inherits the bad outcome.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html#comment-78793</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery-law.html#comment-78793</guid> <description>Why doesn&#039;t anyone bother to look at the studies? &lt;br/&gt;http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/52/5/310&lt;br/&gt;http://www.nber.org/confer/2005/hcs05/miller.pdf&lt;br/&gt;Comparing apples-to-apples (normal pregnancies presenting no complications) midwives have equivalent outcomes without as much cutting and other invasive procedures?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As our friend from the North, Dr. Quisling-Hamsen, Oh, I mean Isberg,  points out--U.S. obstetrics is the stray datapoint, way out of international norms as far as invasive procedures.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are risks to going to a midwife; there are risks to going to a doctor.  No one knows which is better.  People should be able to chose; that&#039;s what this law did.  That&#039;s good--and doctors are dastardly to oppose it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t anyone bother to look at the studies? <br /><a href="http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/52/5/310" rel="nofollow">http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/52/5/310</a><br /><a href="http://www.nber.org/confer/2005/hcs05/miller.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nber.org/confer/2005/hcs05/miller.pdf</a><br />Comparing apples-to-apples (normal pregnancies presenting no complications) midwives have equivalent outcomes without as much cutting and other invasive procedures?</p><p>As our friend from the North, Dr. Quisling-Hamsen, Oh, I mean Isberg,  points out&#8211;U.S. obstetrics is the stray datapoint, way out of international norms as far as invasive procedures.</p><p>There are risks to going to a midwife; there are risks to going to a doctor.  No one knows which is better.  People should be able to chose; that&#8217;s what this law did.  That&#8217;s good&#8211;and doctors are dastardly to oppose it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Maggie Rosethorn</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html#comment-78784</link> <dc:creator>Maggie Rosethorn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery-law.html#comment-78784</guid> <description>Going back to the ORIGINAL point of the post, as a CNM (certified nurse-midwife) I have to say I am glad this law is being contested.  Most reliable midwives (nurse-midwives AND Certified Professional midwives) that I know PREFER to have a backup physician, a person whom they can trust to refer higher risk patients to or discuss them with.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am not naive or an idiot; I am well aware that many midwives consider MD&#039;s to be the worst evil in the medical world, or that the midwife can do things as well or better as an MD.  (and yes, I have heard them talk).  But I also believe that many times, Obstetrics has gotten too much like an illness and too little like a normal event.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I had high risk pregnancies and used an OB.  I have cared for many women and had wonderful, safe deliveries and many women who ended up needing medical interventions for one reason or another.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I really believe that midwives and physicians can work together and tricks like this one are wrong.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One last thing:  I have read many of the debates regarding MD vs midwife, home birth vs hospital.  If you look at many European countries where women DO deliver at home, with a midwife, you see that many do just fine.  However, here in the US we don&#039;t have the infrastructure to do that safely.  You can&#039;t compare those apples and oranges.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Many midwives have great statistics.  However, if you compare them to a MD ONLY COMPARING SIMILAR PATIENTS (drop all the high risk patients the MD has), I think most doctors would show the same great statistics.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going back to the ORIGINAL point of the post, as a CNM (certified nurse-midwife) I have to say I am glad this law is being contested.  Most reliable midwives (nurse-midwives AND Certified Professional midwives) that I know PREFER to have a backup physician, a person whom they can trust to refer higher risk patients to or discuss them with.</p><p>I am not naive or an idiot; I am well aware that many midwives consider MD&#8217;s to be the worst evil in the medical world, or that the midwife can do things as well or better as an MD.  (and yes, I have heard them talk).  But I also believe that many times, Obstetrics has gotten too much like an illness and too little like a normal event.</p><p>I had high risk pregnancies and used an OB.  I have cared for many women and had wonderful, safe deliveries and many women who ended up needing medical interventions for one reason or another.</p><p>I really believe that midwives and physicians can work together and tricks like this one are wrong.</p><p>One last thing:  I have read many of the debates regarding MD vs midwife, home birth vs hospital.  If you look at many European countries where women DO deliver at home, with a midwife, you see that many do just fine.  However, here in the US we don&#8217;t have the infrastructure to do that safely.  You can&#8217;t compare those apples and oranges.</p><p>Many midwives have great statistics.  However, if you compare them to a MD ONLY COMPARING SIMILAR PATIENTS (drop all the high risk patients the MD has), I think most doctors would show the same great statistics.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html#comment-78780</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery-law.html#comment-78780</guid> <description>Hey, Mike, thy name is confirmation basis.  Look at the numbers.  Do what doctors so rarely do--look at the evidence?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Undoubtedly, midwives go to doctors when there&#039;re complications.  As they should.  And, no doubt, it&#039;s a stressful challenge . . . uh . . . but that&#039;s your job and why you get the big bucks.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However, for the vast majority of normal cases, cutting-happy doctors, with their drugs and unnecessary procedures, may not be the best choice.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you were really concerned about women&#039;s health, you&#039;d accept this.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Mike, thy name is confirmation basis.  Look at the numbers.  Do what doctors so rarely do&#8211;look at the evidence?</p><p>Undoubtedly, midwives go to doctors when there&#8217;re complications.  As they should.  And, no doubt, it&#8217;s a stressful challenge . . . uh . . . but that&#8217;s your job and why you get the big bucks.</p><p>However, for the vast majority of normal cases, cutting-happy doctors, with their drugs and unnecessary procedures, may not be the best choice.</p><p>If you were really concerned about women&#8217;s health, you&#8217;d accept this.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html#comment-78764</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 01:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery-law.html#comment-78764</guid> <description>&quot;In fact, some studies suggest midwifery LOWERS neonatal mortality rates.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yeah, okay. Midwives have better outcomes than OB&#039;s. Does anyone in their freaking mind believe this garbage???&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;How many midwife deliveries have these dingbats actually attended where the thing goies HORRIBLY wrong and the doctor must step in? I HAVE I HAVE!!! And I&#039;m sure there aren&#039;t ANY Wwhere an OB said &quot;Please Midwife, help meeeeee!!!&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To those whi crave all these superior midwife outcomes, please, do all OB&#039;s afavor and NEVER DARKEN THEIR DOORSTEP!!! They won&#039;t miss you, believe me.&lt;br/&gt; Of course, most Americans have snese and wouldn&#039;t choose such a thing.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In fact, some studies suggest midwifery LOWERS neonatal mortality rates.&#8221;</p><p>Yeah, okay. Midwives have better outcomes than OB&#8217;s. Does anyone in their freaking mind believe this garbage???</p><p>How many midwife deliveries have these dingbats actually attended where the thing goies HORRIBLY wrong and the doctor must step in? I HAVE I HAVE!!! And I&#8217;m sure there aren&#8217;t ANY Wwhere an OB said &#8220;Please Midwife, help meeeeee!!!&#8221;</p><p>To those whi crave all these superior midwife outcomes, please, do all OB&#8217;s afavor and NEVER DARKEN THEIR DOORSTEP!!! They won&#8217;t miss you, believe me.<br /> Of course, most Americans have snese and wouldn&#8217;t choose such a thing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Happyman</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery.html#comment-78746</link> <dc:creator>Happyman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/08/physicians-sue-missouri-over-midwifery-law.html#comment-78746</guid> <description>amen poster 1:07 - &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In fact, for the minute-clinics that the undereducated masses are screaming for, the mid-levels doling out antibiotics &amp; viagra should NOT have supervision by an MD off-site, and should bear the full responsibility of treating their patients, especially when the treat that &quot;cold&quot; with a z-pak when it was really a CHF or COPD exacerbation.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amen poster 1:07 &#8211;</p><p>In fact, for the minute-clinics that the undereducated masses are screaming for, the mid-levels doling out antibiotics &#038; viagra should NOT have supervision by an MD off-site, and should bear the full responsibility of treating their patients, especially when the treat that &#8220;cold&#8221; with a z-pak when it was really a CHF or COPD exacerbation.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.004 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 440/444 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 17:15:16 -->
