Many say that the UK’s NHS provides cheaper health care. Not so, when waiting times are factored in:
When he eventually receives the surgery the official cost is $6,000 or $4,000 cheaper than the U.S. The socialists crow about the “cheaper” alternative. They completely ignore the lost wages. A four month wait would be around 17 weeks of lost wages. There is the one week recuperation period as well. The lost wages would amount to $10,800. The surgery was $6,000. The total, cost would be $16,800. That’s $5,600 more than in the U.S.
Related posts:
- Palliative care and cost savings
- Primary care is damn cheap, and can solve our health care woes
- Waiting hours to see a doctor, and patients billing physicians for lost time
- Does ePrescribe cost pharmacies money?
- The cost of “free” healthcare redux
- Charlie Weis takes the stand
- The make-believe savings of single-payer
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 6 comments }
Assumes facts not in evidence.
The most important lack in the argument is the idea that all wait times in the US are zero, which ignores the fact that around 20% or so of the population has no insurance at all to pay for needed medical care.
I had a patient in his 20s. He had recurring fevers and cough, with abnormal chest X-rays consistent with infiltrate in the same location every time. He was otherwise healthy, but had no insurance and was uninsurable due to his recurring pneumonias. He had paid out of pocket for FULL workups from ID and pulmonary but nobody would bronch. him without insurance. This process went on for 3 years during which he was unable to work.
Factor in THAT cost and many others like it. The fact is in his case, committing a crime would have been a wise choice medically.
If you really think that’s an advanced, superior health system, good on you, but I think most people would disagree and would see it as a bizarre torturous system of nested Catch-22’s.
Even with insurance there can be significant waits for precertification Also I think the recovery period applys here toobut it wasa nice try to pad your charge estimate.
It doesn’t say there is no wait time in the US but the wait periods are signficantly less than in nationalized systems. Where there are wait times in the US are not for debilitating problems but for normal physician check ups and so forth.
Why didn’t the 20’s have health insurance? Was he always sick? Does he enjoy cable television and a cell phone like every other 20 something males does? Just trying to get some context here.
Bullshit! I take care of uninsured patients all of the time. The wait time to get surgery is under two weeks. The patient has to make a good faith comittment to pay me and the hospital (the hospital requires a $500 deposit if I cannot certify that the surgery is an emergency). Sometimes the patient actually makes the payments but that is just part of life.
Anon 5:21, sorry but those were the facts. Nobody would do a procedure on him, period. He was willing to pay and nobody here would do it. Also Anon 2:21, I believe he had changed jobs and was waiting for his new insurance when he first got ill. After his second episode he tried to get insurance and was turned down. But again, this is the best health care system in the world, so it must have been the patient’s fault.
Comments on this entry are closed.