More on Botox vs mole checks

August 30, 2007

More on the no-brainer study suggesting it’s easier to see a dermatologist for Botox:

This can be spun in two ways. #1. Dermatologists are greedy and make patients with a potentially cancerous skin lesion wait weeks while cosmetic patients get through to the front of the line. #2. Health Insurance is willing to pay a professional with 12 or more years of advanced training as little as $20 to evaluate a potentially fatal condition. Take your pick.



Related posts:

  1. Botox, mole checks, and third-party payers
  2. Mole removal made easy
  3. Should you be allowed to refuse health insurance?
  4. A Mole In My Eye
  5. A Changing Mole
  6. Not buying McGuire’s excuse
  7. Botox


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 comment }

1 Judy August 30, 2007 at 1:14 pm

Around here new patient visits to dermatologist can take months, not weeks. I doubt it matters whether it’s Botox or a mole. There is ONE doc who greatly limits the insurance companies he accepts. I can get an appointment with him within 2 weeks EVERY time. Fortunately, he accepts my insurance and he’d be my first choice anyway.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Exception to the rule

Next post: Mickey Mouse sign

Site Meter