<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: When patients blog about doctors</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/when-patients-blog-about-doctors.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/when-patients-blog-about-doctors.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: DR. MARY JOHNSON</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/when-patients-blog-about-doctors.html#comment-77851</link> <dc:creator>DR. MARY JOHNSON</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/when-patients-blog-about-doctors.html#comment-77851</guid> <description>I&#039;ve unfortunately had to think about it a great deal . . . both as a doctor and a patient.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sometimes the patients are right.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&#039;t believe legislation is necessary to address this &quot;problem&quot;.  Once a patient &quot;violates&quot; the privilege and starts talking openly, doctors do have the legal right to respond.  Most don&#039;t.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Just like most doctors do not discuss a malpractice case once its resolved, and even if they &quot;won&quot;.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And allow me to make the observation that the press is just lazy most of the time.  They could get the patient making the allegations to sign a release for medical records (which, by my experience, doesn&#039;t generally tell the story the press is looking for anyway - medical mistakes often don&#039;t get a lot of detailed documentation).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve unfortunately had to think about it a great deal . . . both as a doctor and a patient.</p><p>Sometimes the patients are right.</p><p>I don&#8217;t believe legislation is necessary to address this &#8220;problem&#8221;.  Once a patient &#8220;violates&#8221; the privilege and starts talking openly, doctors do have the legal right to respond.  Most don&#8217;t.</p><p>Just like most doctors do not discuss a malpractice case once its resolved, and even if they &#8220;won&#8221;.</p><p>And allow me to make the observation that the press is just lazy most of the time.  They could get the patient making the allegations to sign a release for medical records (which, by my experience, doesn&#8217;t generally tell the story the press is looking for anyway &#8211; medical mistakes often don&#8217;t get a lot of detailed documentation).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Christine</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/when-patients-blog-about-doctors.html#comment-77850</link> <dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/when-patients-blog-about-doctors.html#comment-77850</guid> <description>I dunno, maybe cause they psychiatrist isn&#039;t spilling their guts to the patient?  C&#039;mon folks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, maybe cause they psychiatrist isn&#8217;t spilling their guts to the patient?  C&#8217;mon folks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/when-patients-blog-about-doctors.html#comment-77846</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/when-patients-blog-about-doctors.html#comment-77846</guid> <description>of course not, because Congress, in it&#039;s desire to shield their members with STD&#039;s, didn&#039;t include that in HIPPA</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course not, because Congress, in it&#8217;s desire to shield their members with STD&#8217;s, didn&#8217;t include that in HIPPA</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/when-patients-blog-about-doctors.html#comment-77836</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/when-patients-blog-about-doctors.html#comment-77836</guid> <description>boy this is an interesting post! Never really thought about this before....but...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;How about some legislation that says IF a patient starts discussing in public their care, particularly if it happens to be disparaging of the care practitioners, that it implies consent for the care practitioners to respond in kind (i.e. public dissemination of information)?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Isn&#039;t there some precedent that allow for this?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>boy this is an interesting post! Never really thought about this before&#8230;.but&#8230;</p><p>How about some legislation that says IF a patient starts discussing in public their care, particularly if it happens to be disparaging of the care practitioners, that it implies consent for the care practitioners to respond in kind (i.e. public dissemination of information)?</p><p>Isn&#8217;t there some precedent that allow for this?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 374/378 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 17:00:38 -->
