A vicious op-ed in the Washington Post slams the AMA. No doubt, many physicians may feel the same way:
You might expect that the AMA would fight the insurers, hospitals, government bureaucrats and ivory tower academics who have diminished physicians’ incomes, besmirched their ethical reputations and compromised their professionalism — but you would be wrong. No, instead, at its annual meeting last month, the AMA declared war on retail medical clinics, located in places such as CVS and Wal-Mart.
(via Dr. Wes)
Similar Posts:
- Should primary care doctors embrace retail clinics?
- Is banning industry-sponsored CME a good idea?
- Poll: How should doctors make patients responsible for their own health?
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 3 comments }
The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. The Mass Medical Society’s doing the same thing.
Talk about being out of touch.
I tell you, the Horcruxes are everywhere!
Read the article.
The writer takes a few swats at the AMA, ostensibly for not taking on the insurers, which is a fair cop. But half of the “op-ed” is devoted to a defense of retail pharmacy walk-in clinics and to wrapping that business in the flag while dumping apple pie on top.
The writer is a stalking horse for the retail pharmacists and their sponsoring companies: major drugstore chains and That Company from Arkansas.
Comments on this entry are closed.