Pharmacists sue over Plan B

July 31, 2007

An “opt-out” clause wasn’t enough to satisfy these pharmacists:

Pharmacists have sued Washington state over a new regulation that requires them to sell emergency contraception, also known as the “morning-after pill.”

In a lawsuit filed in federal court Wednesday, a pharmacy owner and two pharmacists say the rule that took effect Thursday violates their civil rights by forcing them into choosing between “their livelihoods and their deeply held religious and moral beliefs.”



Related posts:

  1. Catholic pharmacists and the Pope
  2. My take: Paying for call, Muslims in medicine
  3. Doctors vs pharmacists in Canada redux
  4. Add clinical pharmacists as another mid-level threat to PCPs
  5. Pharmacists are beginning to feel the reimbursement pain
  6. Pharmacists join the mid-level generalist surge
  7. Pharmacists and physicians


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 5 comments }

1 Evan July 31, 2007 at 2:46 pm

Well what an absolutely ridiculous argument.

It’s a like a Mormon bartender making the same argument. If they don’t like prescription contraceptives they ought to do another livelihood. It’s not like they didn’t know about their existence when they trained.

How many Christian Scientist doctors are there?

2 Rian July 31, 2007 at 2:59 pm

If these retards have a problem with Plan B, they just simply shouldn’t stock it.

“Sorry, we don’t have any in stock.”

It’s really not that hard. But these arguments are over-the-top.

This article might shake their “deeply held religious beliefs” a bit.

3 Anonymous July 31, 2007 at 5:52 pm

What they didn’t know when they trained was that the American people were on a trend of devaluing personal liberty so little as to put it beneath even convenience.

I think they should be free to not sell whatever they don’t want to sell, wether it is “deeply held religious beliefs” or a passing personal fancy is no one elses business.

A Mormon bartender is perfectly free to get a liquor liscense, hang up a sign that says “Bar” and sell only milk and ginger ale if he wants. The state doesn’t have the right to dictate to his that he must sell the products that it thinks he sould sell.

Come on people, lets have a little “land of the free” here.

4 Evan August 1, 2007 at 8:29 am

Anon 5:52, well that Mormon bartender would not need a liquor license though, would he?

But the crux of what you say is that the US is devaluing human life. So let’s be very clear, do you think that it devalues life to sell birth control pills?

Because if you do, you are far out of the mainstream of US opinion.

5 Anonymous August 1, 2007 at 8:32 am

Pharmacists aren’t bartenders. The state has a compelling interest to regulate that an adequate supply of specific medicines be available to patients.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Placebo Television

Next post: "The AMA is proud of Dr. Pou"

Site Meter