This should be mandatory in medical school. This eye-opening experience really demonstrates the lamb-like, idealistic naivety of American medical students today.
Related posts:
- Medical students avoiding primary care, is it more than money?
- Is depression more prevalent in medical students?
- Match Day comes and goes, and did medical students continue to avoid primary care?
- Empathy and medical school
- Medical students want to become primary care doctors, until reality hits
- Medical marijuana and college students
- Medical students lobby Congress for lower medical school tuition
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 2 comments }
The poster at the boottom is dead on. How can insurance companies cry “Poor!” if their stocks are going through the roof? I mean, Jim Kramer has had a love affair with UnitedHelath for song long, it can’t be becausethey stopped just one or two MRI’s. Its a systematic way for these companies to make money off of the American healthcare dollar, money that should be going to doctors. Why should these insurance ghouls be entitled to a damn penny???
I know, I know. Because doctors couldn’t control themselves in the 70’s and 80’s. Great, so now we have a whole new subset of greedy b*&%$#@, and they arent even seeing patients.
Makes me so ANGRY!
The last line:
He [Rivo] said one doctor might get 41 percent of patients needing mammograms to have them done while another doctor gets 90 percent compliance. Under the concept of pay-for-performance, perhaps one doctors should be rewarded more than another.
One student immediately objected: ”It’s not your fault,” he said, defending the doctors. Patients should be held responsible for doing what’s right, not doctors.
”So you should drop bad patients?” Rivo asked. The student didn’t answer.
I suppose the students are “idealistic lambs”. In fairness, though, they are not law students. Debate may not have been their strong point in college.
Personally, my answer would have been “yes”. Under P-4-P, the doctors should drop “bad patients” who will not quit unhealthful habits. The doctor didn’t create the incentive, the insurance company did. The doctor’s ethical choice would be to not sign in the first place I suppose. I’d have brought that up as well.
Also in fairness to the medical students, they are in a position where faculty can throw them out on a whim. The school sent them to the insurance company, with implied endorsement. If I were a medical student in that position, I’d be hard pressed to argue with an insurance company executive who questioned my ethics.
Of course, now that I’m out of that position, if an insurance executive questioned my ethics, I’d suggest in that public forum, that the insurance executive wouldn’t know what ethics was if it bit him in the ass.
Comments on this entry are closed.