That’s the current trend:
Since 1996-97, a 40 percent increase in the female primary care physician supply has helped to offset a 16 percent decline in the male primary care physician supply relative to the U.S. population. At the same time, primary care physicians’ incomes have lost ground to both inflation and medical and surgical specialists’ incomes. And women in primary care face a 22 percent income gap relative to men, even after accounting for differing characteristics. If real incomes for primary care physicians continue to decline, there is a risk that the migration of male physicians will intensify and that female physicians may begin avoiding primary care””trends that could aggravate a predicted shortage of primary care physicians.
Related posts:
- Should specialists be re-trained as primary care physicians?
- Will specialists sacrifice to pay primary care doctors? Are budget-neutral changes the only option?
- How specialists view universal health care
- Should specialists spread the wealth to primary care?
- Primary care, supply and demand
- Should primary care distance themselves from specialists?
- Primary care is supported by international medical graduates
KevinMD.com on Facebook
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe





{ 1 comment }
A 22% difference in male vs. female PCP incomes when all factors are accounted for??? (hours worked, demographics, etc)
Oh please. This can only mean that those low earners are grossly incomepetent about running their practices.
Comments on this entry are closed.