<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Health Advisory Council: More snubs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/google-health-advisory-council-more.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/google-health-advisory-council-more.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:35:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KoKo</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/google-health-advisory-council-more.html/comment-page-1#comment-77869</link>
		<dc:creator>KoKo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 07:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/the-google-health-advisory-council-more-snubs.html#comment-77869</guid>
		<description>ANON:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It isn&#039;t the job of the radiologist to &quot;call&quot; the patient.  Their job is to interpret the mammogram in&lt;br/&gt;a professional manner.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sounds like you may need a career change.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANON:</p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t the job of the radiologist to &#8220;call&#8221; the patient.  Their job is to interpret the mammogram in<br />a professional manner.</p>
<p>Sounds like you may need a career change.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/google-health-advisory-council-more.html/comment-page-1#comment-77865</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/the-google-health-advisory-council-more-snubs.html#comment-77865</guid>
		<description>If you see the readings I get from our local radiologists regardless of the study, I&#039;d exclude them too.  too often, they act as technicians offering no clinical value.  Heck, 5 years - 350,000+, and playing with computers.  I&#039;d switch anyday of the week and rather be excluded from google&#039;s committee rather than works 60+ weeks, paid $150,000, seeing 25 pt per day (yes humans), spend time trying to read the study and see if it helps me clinically mame a decision, call families with results, etc.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;ps: When was teh last time that a radioligst called and spoke to a patient after an abnormal mamogram.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Google is right to exclude technicians,  and only keep physicians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you see the readings I get from our local radiologists regardless of the study, I&#8217;d exclude them too.  too often, they act as technicians offering no clinical value.  Heck, 5 years &#8211; 350,000+, and playing with computers.  I&#8217;d switch anyday of the week and rather be excluded from google&#8217;s committee rather than works 60+ weeks, paid $150,000, seeing 25 pt per day (yes humans), spend time trying to read the study and see if it helps me clinically mame a decision, call families with results, etc.</p>
<p>ps: When was teh last time that a radioligst called and spoke to a patient after an abnormal mamogram.  </p>
<p>Google is right to exclude technicians,  and only keep physicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
