In a New Yorker op-ed:
“Sicko” doesn’t really offer solutions. Yes, it visits France. But it doesn’t discuss the difficulties of reforming a system that encompasses sixteen per cent of the economy. It doesn’t investigate the tradeoffs that universal health care will inevitably require. It’s an outrage machine.
Related posts:
- Sicko: Box office analysis
- Canadians maul Sicko
- David Hogberg reviews Sicko
- Sicko one-sided? It can’t be . . .
- The New Yorker on Sicko
- Sicko: Socialism in a capitalist society?
- Gawande on health reform: "It is not single-payer"
KevinMD.com on Facebook
Scrubs
{ 1 comment }
Outrage is good. Let the economists and think tanks and care providers devlop the system. I don’t need Mr. Moore coming up with any solutions. We shouldn’t look to him for solutions. However, without public outrage – nothing will change.
As doctors, we need to learn how to influence public opinion, not jsut be the victims of said opinion.
Comments on this entry are closed.