<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electronic medical records and the iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/electronic-medical-records-and-iphone.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/electronic-medical-records-and-iphone.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:18:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/electronic-medical-records-and-iphone.html/comment-page-1#comment-77407</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/electronic-medical-records-and-the-iphone.html#comment-77407</guid>
		<description>I posted this on Medgadget, but this frustrates me enough that I wanted to repeat it here. Feel free to remove it if you so please.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sounds like they wanted to write-off buying iPhone&#039;s on the company card. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The beauty of the iPhone is that it can load just about any web site nicely. The fact that their EMR system works on the iPhone is a hat-tip to the Apple guys, not the LifeRecord folks. Any web-based EMR would run equally as well on the iPhone browser.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Don&#039;t even get me started on the copyright infringement they are into. Their web site mimics the Apple web site (or at least the design from a few weeks ago). Their application uses brushed metal throughout. The &quot;i&quot; in the LivePractice icon is the Apple podcast icon. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;They also claim to offer the ability to video conference with other doctors via their application. That&#039;s great, except it&#039;s using iChat, which comes free with every Mac.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s great that they think Apple&#039;s design is superior and elegant, however simply stealing their design directly is shameful. There is nothing innovative about their product.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;------&lt;br/&gt;Excellent blog, Kevin - been subscribed for a few months now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted this on Medgadget, but this frustrates me enough that I wanted to repeat it here. Feel free to remove it if you so please.</p>
<p>Sounds like they wanted to write-off buying iPhone&#8217;s on the company card. </p>
<p>The beauty of the iPhone is that it can load just about any web site nicely. The fact that their EMR system works on the iPhone is a hat-tip to the Apple guys, not the LifeRecord folks. Any web-based EMR would run equally as well on the iPhone browser.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t even get me started on the copyright infringement they are into. Their web site mimics the Apple web site (or at least the design from a few weeks ago). Their application uses brushed metal throughout. The &#8220;i&#8221; in the LivePractice icon is the Apple podcast icon. </p>
<p>They also claim to offer the ability to video conference with other doctors via their application. That&#8217;s great, except it&#8217;s using iChat, which comes free with every Mac.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great that they think Apple&#8217;s design is superior and elegant, however simply stealing their design directly is shameful. There is nothing innovative about their product.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;<br />Excellent blog, Kevin &#8211; been subscribed for a few months now <img src='http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2010-03-19 17:08:55 -->