<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The deterioration of &quot;free&quot; care in Canada</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/deterioration-of-free-care-in-canada.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/deterioration-of-free-care-in-canada.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/deterioration-of-free-care-in-canada.html#comment-78467</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/the-deterioration-of-free-care-in-canada.html#comment-78467</guid> <description>My take on the system, from what I&#039;ve read, it&#039;s kinda like our situation with Medicare. You&#039;re 100% in, or 100% out. The &quot;opted-out&quot; status we have here with Medicare, where you have to sign certain forms, you&#039;re out for two years, you have to have patients sign certain disclaimers, etc.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I recognize that some feel the &quot;opted-out&quot; status is contrary to the original Medicare legislation from 1965, that we should be able to see some Medicare recipients in the system, others privately, etc. I don&#039;t want to be the test case for that........&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyway, it&#039;s kinda like that in Canada. You&#039;re 100% in their system, or 100% out. Hence, there are private free-standing clinics in Canada. As long as they&#039;re 100% out of their system, they&#039;ll be a relatively small number.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It all changes if patients are allowed to apply a Medicare payment toward a private bill, or if docs are allowed to keep Medicare hours and private hours, as in the UK.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We need a USA/American Chaoulli.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on the system, from what I&#8217;ve read, it&#8217;s kinda like our situation with Medicare. You&#8217;re 100% in, or 100% out. The &#8220;opted-out&#8221; status we have here with Medicare, where you have to sign certain forms, you&#8217;re out for two years, you have to have patients sign certain disclaimers, etc.</p><p>I recognize that some feel the &#8220;opted-out&#8221; status is contrary to the original Medicare legislation from 1965, that we should be able to see some Medicare recipients in the system, others privately, etc. I don&#8217;t want to be the test case for that&#8230;&#8230;..</p><p>Anyway, it&#8217;s kinda like that in Canada. You&#8217;re 100% in their system, or 100% out. Hence, there are private free-standing clinics in Canada. As long as they&#8217;re 100% out of their system, they&#8217;ll be a relatively small number.</p><p>It all changes if patients are allowed to apply a Medicare payment toward a private bill, or if docs are allowed to keep Medicare hours and private hours, as in the UK.</p><p>We need a USA/American Chaoulli.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 341/345 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 18:41:36 -->
