<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN responds to Michael Moore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/cnn-responds-to-michael-moore.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/cnn-responds-to-michael-moore.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:15:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/cnn-responds-to-michael-moore.html/comment-page-1#comment-77729</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/cnn-responds-to-michael-moore.html#comment-77729</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;ll let readers decide. 10 total points. Of those 10, CNN feels they need not respond to 3 of them. Of the other seven, they respond, and on one of them they admit that THEY made the error.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;10 potential points to compare accuracy. On only ONE point is there someone who made an error that must be corrected and that error is CNN&#039;s. Yet for you Anon and for Kevin, that goes under the board and it&#039;s all Michael Moore&#039;s fault for &quot;creating a controversy where none exists.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I sincerely hope most readers have clicked over to see that 70% of Moore&#039;s criticisms were found to have merit and in one case CNN retracted their error. Where is the error Moore made that he has to retract?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ll let readers decide. 10 total points. Of those 10, CNN feels they need not respond to 3 of them. Of the other seven, they respond, and on one of them they admit that THEY made the error.</p>
<p>10 potential points to compare accuracy. On only ONE point is there someone who made an error that must be corrected and that error is CNN&#8217;s. Yet for you Anon and for Kevin, that goes under the board and it&#8217;s all Michael Moore&#8217;s fault for &#8220;creating a controversy where none exists.&#8221;</p>
<p>I sincerely hope most readers have clicked over to see that 70% of Moore&#8217;s criticisms were found to have merit and in one case CNN retracted their error. Where is the error Moore made that he has to retract?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/cnn-responds-to-michael-moore.html/comment-page-1#comment-77724</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/cnn-responds-to-michael-moore.html#comment-77724</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Evan, for showing yourself as being intellectually dishonest.  I&#039;ll just take 2 points that you&#039;ve mentioned and prove my point - &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;that statement is ONLY in response to the first point&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;That would be incorrect.  In reading the article, all I had to do was simply copy and paste, just like Kevin, along with the relevant points - &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Point 4 - &quot;Again, Moore seems to be creating controversy where none exists.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Point 10 - &quot;Again, Moore seems to be creating controversy where there is none.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I actually appreciate Kevin just copying and pasting that one statement from the article.  It really does sum up what Moore is doing.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now onto the 2nd point - &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;...on other points they admit they were wrong and Moore was right.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;To say that there was more than one point where CNN admitted they were wrong is blatantly false.  In only one point does CNN apologize for falsehood - &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Point 2 - &quot;CNN has corrected and apologized for an error in transcription in our report. We did so on television and online.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So, for you to say that Kevin is being misleading only shows your own hypocrisy and misleadings.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As it stands, let the readers judge for themselves.  Who are you to tell Kevin what he can or can&#039;t do as well as how to do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Evan, for showing yourself as being intellectually dishonest.  I&#8217;ll just take 2 points that you&#8217;ve mentioned and prove my point &#8211; </p>
<p>&#8220;that statement is ONLY in response to the first point&#8221;</p>
<p>That would be incorrect.  In reading the article, all I had to do was simply copy and paste, just like Kevin, along with the relevant points &#8211; </p>
<p>Point 4 &#8211; &#8220;Again, Moore seems to be creating controversy where none exists.&#8221;</p>
<p>Point 10 &#8211; &#8220;Again, Moore seems to be creating controversy where there is none.&#8221;</p>
<p>I actually appreciate Kevin just copying and pasting that one statement from the article.  It really does sum up what Moore is doing.</p>
<p>Now onto the 2nd point &#8211; </p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;on other points they admit they were wrong and Moore was right.&#8221;</p>
<p>To say that there was more than one point where CNN admitted they were wrong is blatantly false.  In only one point does CNN apologize for falsehood &#8211; </p>
<p>Point 2 &#8211; &#8220;CNN has corrected and apologized for an error in transcription in our report. We did so on television and online.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, for you to say that Kevin is being misleading only shows your own hypocrisy and misleadings.</p>
<p>As it stands, let the readers judge for themselves.  Who are you to tell Kevin what he can or can&#8217;t do as well as how to do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/07/cnn-responds-to-michael-moore.html/comment-page-1#comment-77721</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/07/cnn-responds-to-michael-moore.html#comment-77721</guid>
		<description>Kevin, that statement is ONLY in response to the first point Moore made about US and Cuba being separated by one country on the rankings by the WHO. They are most certainly not making that a general statement as on other points they admit they were wrong and Moore was right. That is a misleading quote to put up for people who don&#039;t click through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, that statement is ONLY in response to the first point Moore made about US and Cuba being separated by one country on the rankings by the WHO. They are most certainly not making that a general statement as on other points they admit they were wrong and Moore was right. That is a misleading quote to put up for people who don&#8217;t click through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
