<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The value of physicians&#8217; time</title> <atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/value-of-physicians-time.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/value-of-physicians-time.html</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-76017</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-76017</guid> <description>Third parties decide how much they will offer to pay for a physician&#039;s services.  The physician agrees to that as a valuation of his worth when he accepts that payment.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Look around you.  When good doctors decide to not play that game and set their fees, spending more than the 2 minutes that jb thinks it takes to follow-up a person with hypertension, people pay those fees because they also values the doctors time more than the non-patient third party.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I hope jb never manages hypertension.  If he does do so with those 1-2 minute viists, then he will never learn that the guy who says he doesn&#039;t smoke means he doesn&#039;t do it all day like he used to, his marriage is driving up his blood pressure, which is further exacerbated by the bottle of vodka in his desk which he starts nipping at by 1 pm (it used to be a shot at 4 &quot;to get me through the last hour&quot;) to deal with a soul killing job.  He will certainly never learn that sometimes, upon hearing these things empathetically, a few well-times comments can give the guy the nudge he needs to start  cleaning up some of this business.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Third parties decide how much they will offer to pay for a physician&#8217;s services.  The physician agrees to that as a valuation of his worth when he accepts that payment.</p><p>Look around you.  When good doctors decide to not play that game and set their fees, spending more than the 2 minutes that jb thinks it takes to follow-up a person with hypertension, people pay those fees because they also values the doctors time more than the non-patient third party.</p><p>I hope jb never manages hypertension.  If he does do so with those 1-2 minute viists, then he will never learn that the guy who says he doesn&#8217;t smoke means he doesn&#8217;t do it all day like he used to, his marriage is driving up his blood pressure, which is further exacerbated by the bottle of vodka in his desk which he starts nipping at by 1 pm (it used to be a shot at 4 &#8220;to get me through the last hour&#8221;) to deal with a soul killing job.  He will certainly never learn that sometimes, upon hearing these things empathetically, a few well-times comments can give the guy the nudge he needs to start  cleaning up some of this business.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jb</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-75993</link> <dc:creator>jb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-75993</guid> <description>Mike, you&#039;re 100% correct.  We don&#039;t want this situation, for this and multiple other reasons, but that is what we have.  We have a system where 3rd parties (CMS functionaries) decide how much your visit with Sammy Senior is worth, at least in monetary terms.  That&#039;s all the $ you get, so the rest of your compensation, if any, will have to be psychic/emotional.  Same with taking care of kids- peds typically have low incomes compares to other MDs and DOs, but some folks really enjoy working with kids, and that is enough compensation for them.  I also enjoy working with (some) kids and (some) old folks, but not enough enjoyment and not with enough of them to make it a full time job.  You don&#039;t really think that the CMS bureaucrats care a lot if granny has to wait a month or more to see her physician?  The doc might order a blood test or (horrors) an MRI!  That costs even more money.  Better that she should wait a month.  Granny might die in the interim, thus saving the government the cost of that obscenely expensive, unnecessary MRI.  Everyone wins, except Granny.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, you&#8217;re 100% correct.  We don&#8217;t want this situation, for this and multiple other reasons, but that is what we have.  We have a system where 3rd parties (CMS functionaries) decide how much your visit with Sammy Senior is worth, at least in monetary terms.  That&#8217;s all the $ you get, so the rest of your compensation, if any, will have to be psychic/emotional.  Same with taking care of kids- peds typically have low incomes compares to other MDs and DOs, but some folks really enjoy working with kids, and that is enough compensation for them.  I also enjoy working with (some) kids and (some) old folks, but not enough enjoyment and not with enough of them to make it a full time job.  You don&#8217;t really think that the CMS bureaucrats care a lot if granny has to wait a month or more to see her physician?  The doc might order a blood test or (horrors) an MRI!  That costs even more money.  Better that she should wait a month.  Granny might die in the interim, thus saving the government the cost of that obscenely expensive, unnecessary MRI.  Everyone wins, except Granny.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-75989</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-75989</guid> <description>jb, I agree with you. But what about geriatricians?? Do we, in this country, want a situation where, the older and slower we get, the less likely a doctor will see us? Because thats what this billing system is satying. and as we all know, older patients dont go as fast. You might have to do a &quot;get up and go&quot; test, etc. And I have now met several geriatricians who are getting out of the nursing homes and seeing less older patients because they just can&#039;t make enough to keep such an office open.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So I don&#039;t agree that &quot;most&quot; patients take very little time. It just depends on what kind of patients you have. And if the message is that you lose money seeing older sicker patients, then that is a situation that should be changed.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I agree that surgeons are getting screwed just as much as primaries.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jb, I agree with you. But what about geriatricians?? Do we, in this country, want a situation where, the older and slower we get, the less likely a doctor will see us? Because thats what this billing system is satying. and as we all know, older patients dont go as fast. You might have to do a &#8220;get up and go&#8221; test, etc. And I have now met several geriatricians who are getting out of the nursing homes and seeing less older patients because they just can&#8217;t make enough to keep such an office open.</p><p>So I don&#8217;t agree that &#8220;most&#8221; patients take very little time. It just depends on what kind of patients you have. And if the message is that you lose money seeing older sicker patients, then that is a situation that should be changed.</p><p>I agree that surgeons are getting screwed just as much as primaries.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jb</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-75978</link> <dc:creator>jb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-75978</guid> <description>More hogwash.&lt;br/&gt;My CPT book has an entire section for non-imaging, non-procedural doctors.  The codes begin with 99xxx- the so-called &quot;evaluation and management&quot; codes, also known as &quot;cognitive&quot; work.  Those are for doctors who are caring for patients without doing procedures or interpreting images.  You are probably aware of these codes, and your complaint is really that they pay less than you wish they paid.  Nevertheless, whining that time is not compensated is just that.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;the rational economic incentive is for the doctor to see patients as quickly as possible...&quot;  No kidding.  How is this different for surgeons? We get a fixed amount for a procedure- we do not have the option of upcoding to a higher level as E/M allows if the patient has multiple problems.  We bill for a 44950 to remove an appendix, whether the patient is 22 years old, thin and healthy and goes home the next day, or older, morbidly obese, diabetic and stays in the hospital a week and requires a dozen office visits for a wound infection.  The global fee covers all care within 90 days of the procedure.  If we do more procedures every day, we earn more money, just like you do with office visits.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Guess what- we don&#039;t get paid for thinking, and the rest of the world doesn&#039;t either.  With rare exceptions, no one gets paid for thinking.  You will get paid for the time you spend evaluating and managing sick people if you document it.  Some of your visits will require a great deal of thought and even looking stuff up, but most of them do not.  Writing a prescription for a classic UTI or re-evaluating a patient with stable hypertension requires minimal thought, yet you will get a 9921x out of it, and face time with the patient can be only a minute or 2.  With that level of intellectual effort, you should not expect more than a couple of dollars by your standards, but you will get whatever 9921x allows despite the absence of thought.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you want to get paid for your time, charge your patients by the minute.  That way if they want to bring up every little problem, it&#039;s on their nickels.  You won&#039;t get an insurance company to play that game, but I have heard of some docs who do not deal with insurance at all, and they charge patients directly, by the minute.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More hogwash.<br />My CPT book has an entire section for non-imaging, non-procedural doctors.  The codes begin with 99xxx- the so-called &#8220;evaluation and management&#8221; codes, also known as &#8220;cognitive&#8221; work.  Those are for doctors who are caring for patients without doing procedures or interpreting images.  You are probably aware of these codes, and your complaint is really that they pay less than you wish they paid.  Nevertheless, whining that time is not compensated is just that.</p><p>&#8220;the rational economic incentive is for the doctor to see patients as quickly as possible&#8230;&#8221;  No kidding.  How is this different for surgeons? We get a fixed amount for a procedure- we do not have the option of upcoding to a higher level as E/M allows if the patient has multiple problems.  We bill for a 44950 to remove an appendix, whether the patient is 22 years old, thin and healthy and goes home the next day, or older, morbidly obese, diabetic and stays in the hospital a week and requires a dozen office visits for a wound infection.  The global fee covers all care within 90 days of the procedure.  If we do more procedures every day, we earn more money, just like you do with office visits.</p><p>Guess what- we don&#8217;t get paid for thinking, and the rest of the world doesn&#8217;t either.  With rare exceptions, no one gets paid for thinking.  You will get paid for the time you spend evaluating and managing sick people if you document it.  Some of your visits will require a great deal of thought and even looking stuff up, but most of them do not.  Writing a prescription for a classic UTI or re-evaluating a patient with stable hypertension requires minimal thought, yet you will get a 9921x out of it, and face time with the patient can be only a minute or 2.  With that level of intellectual effort, you should not expect more than a couple of dollars by your standards, but you will get whatever 9921x allows despite the absence of thought.</p><p>If you want to get paid for your time, charge your patients by the minute.  That way if they want to bring up every little problem, it&#8217;s on their nickels.  You won&#8217;t get an insurance company to play that game, but I have heard of some docs who do not deal with insurance at all, and they charge patients directly, by the minute.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-75971</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-75971</guid> <description>So the six figure salaries must be for....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the six figure salaries must be for&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: N=1</title><link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-75969</link> <dc:creator>N=1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-value-of-physicians-time.html#comment-75969</guid> <description>Yes -neither nurses&#039; nor physicians&#039; time is deemed of &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://universalhealth.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/payment-for-services-rendered-but-not-for-care/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;value&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes -neither nurses&#8217; nor physicians&#8217; time is deemed of <a HREF="http://universalhealth.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/payment-for-services-rendered-but-not-for-care/" REL="nofollow">value</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 396/400 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.kevinmd.com

Served from: www.kevinmd.com @ 2012-02-14 13:22:58 -->
