<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Texas stampede of physicians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:35:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J. Hubbard, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/comment-page-1#comment-75775</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Hubbard, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-texas-stampede-of-physicians.html#comment-75775</guid>
		<description>I attempted to apply for a Texas license between 11/04 and 11/05 spending $1,100.  Cumbersome, slow, and complex.  There is a one year limitation on completion of all items required.  I gave up at the end of a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I attempted to apply for a Texas license between 11/04 and 11/05 spending $1,100.  Cumbersome, slow, and complex.  There is a one year limitation on completion of all items required.  I gave up at the end of a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/comment-page-1#comment-75773</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-texas-stampede-of-physicians.html#comment-75773</guid>
		<description>If you think all doctors cause harm. Problem solved don&#039;t go see any of them.  Take some Gingo Biloba, adjust your chi and hope you or your family never need to see a physician.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think all doctors cause harm. Problem solved don&#8217;t go see any of them.  Take some Gingo Biloba, adjust your chi and hope you or your family never need to see a physician.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalpel</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/comment-page-1#comment-75760</link>
		<dc:creator>scalpel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-texas-stampede-of-physicians.html#comment-75760</guid>
		<description>Nope, I&#039;ve never caused any harm to a patient, and yet I was sued 5 times prior to 2003 and none since.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Go figure! I enjoy not having to deal with greedy a-hole attorneys. Go fight some traffic tickets, why don&#039;t cha!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, I&#8217;ve never caused any harm to a patient, and yet I was sued 5 times prior to 2003 and none since.</p>
<p>Go figure! I enjoy not having to deal with greedy a-hole attorneys. Go fight some traffic tickets, why don&#8217;t cha!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/comment-page-1#comment-75758</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-texas-stampede-of-physicians.html#comment-75758</guid>
		<description>You enjoy people not being able to recover for the harm you cause?  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If you can live with yourself, I guess that&#039;s all that matters.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;See you during the next &quot;crisis&quot;!  You might avoid getting hurt at the hands of another in the meantime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You enjoy people not being able to recover for the harm you cause?  </p>
<p>If you can live with yourself, I guess that&#8217;s all that matters.</p>
<p>See you during the next &#8220;crisis&#8221;!  You might avoid getting hurt at the hands of another in the meantime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalpel</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/comment-page-1#comment-75753</link>
		<dc:creator>scalpel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-texas-stampede-of-physicians.html#comment-75753</guid>
		<description>To heck with the carbon.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I enjoy not getting sued. Yay for us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To heck with the carbon.</p>
<p>I enjoy not getting sued. Yay for us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/comment-page-1#comment-75750</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-texas-stampede-of-physicians.html#comment-75750</guid>
		<description>Texas also leads the nation in carbon emission pollutants. Go, enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas also leads the nation in carbon emission pollutants. Go, enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/comment-page-1#comment-75749</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-texas-stampede-of-physicians.html#comment-75749</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting the TMLT trust&#039;s numbers.  What that tells you is that you&#039;ve been overcharged for the previous few years, and that losses were nowhere near what they set reserves for.  In effect, the &quot;crisis&quot; didn&#039;t exist.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Go check their payout figures and you&#039;ll see.  The payouts are what matters - and they&#039;ve stayed consistent.  The number of doctors hasn&#039;t even increased with the population.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;Non-meritorious claims intake is down&quot;?  How do you know what cases are or are not meritorious?  Have you looked at the records?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting the TMLT trust&#8217;s numbers.  What that tells you is that you&#8217;ve been overcharged for the previous few years, and that losses were nowhere near what they set reserves for.  In effect, the &#8220;crisis&#8221; didn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>Go check their payout figures and you&#8217;ll see.  The payouts are what matters &#8211; and they&#8217;ve stayed consistent.  The number of doctors hasn&#8217;t even increased with the population.</p>
<p>&#8220;Non-meritorious claims intake is down&#8221;?  How do you know what cases are or are not meritorious?  Have you looked at the records?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/comment-page-1#comment-75746</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 06:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-texas-stampede-of-physicians.html#comment-75746</guid>
		<description>....and that link above is to a tort lawyer&#039;s website.  Assuming the numbers are true (now THAT is risky!), it shows that more than a quarter of specialties are having their rates RAISED!  These were noted to be the following:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;...Internal Medicine  +3.3%, &lt;br/&gt;Infectious Disease, Hospitalists +3.3%,  Gastroenterology + 5.0%, &lt;br/&gt;Interventional Cardiology + 5.8%,  Pathology +10.0%, &lt;br/&gt;Emergency Medicine +15.0%&quot; &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now back to Texas.  On the Texas Medical Liability Trust website, the following was :&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&quot;September 12, 2006…The Board of Governors of Texas Medical Liability Trust (TMLT) has declared a 20% dividend amounting to approximately $35 million for 2006 effective January 1, 2007 for renewing TMLT policyholders. Dividends will be credited to each policyholder’s premium as a lump sum when his or her policy renews in 2007.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In addition, the Trust will be reducing rates 7.5% for all specialties across the state beginning January 1, 2007. Current TMLT policyholders will receive this rate decrease when their policy renews.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;TMLT has now reduced annual rates four times since the passage of House Bill 4 and Proposition 12—12% in 2004; 5% in 2005; 5% in 2006; and now 7.5% in 2007, a total of 29.5% in four years. By the end of 2007, TMLT’s rate reductions, since 2004 will amount to nearly $139 million and returned dividends of 25% will amount to nearly $45 million. Since the passage of Prop 12 and medical liability reform of 2003, TMLT policyholders will have realized cumulative savings of over $180 million.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Non-meritorious claims intake is down as a result of the medical liability reform achievements in 2003. TMLT believes the legal environment will continue to improve as long as 2003 tort reform measures remain in effect.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Because of TMLT’s recent earnings and strong surplus position, physician policyholders can share in the organization’s success in the form of rate reductions and dividends.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Case closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.and that link above is to a tort lawyer&#8217;s website.  Assuming the numbers are true (now THAT is risky!), it shows that more than a quarter of specialties are having their rates RAISED!  These were noted to be the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Internal Medicine  +3.3%, <br />Infectious Disease, Hospitalists +3.3%,  Gastroenterology + 5.0%, <br />Interventional Cardiology + 5.8%,  Pathology +10.0%, <br />Emergency Medicine +15.0%&#8221; </p>
<p>Now back to Texas.  On the Texas Medical Liability Trust website, the following was :</p>
<p>&#8220;September 12, 2006…The Board of Governors of Texas Medical Liability Trust (TMLT) has declared a 20% dividend amounting to approximately $35 million for 2006 effective January 1, 2007 for renewing TMLT policyholders. Dividends will be credited to each policyholder’s premium as a lump sum when his or her policy renews in 2007.</p>
<p>In addition, the Trust will be reducing rates 7.5% for all specialties across the state beginning January 1, 2007. Current TMLT policyholders will receive this rate decrease when their policy renews.</p>
<p>TMLT has now reduced annual rates four times since the passage of House Bill 4 and Proposition 12—12% in 2004; 5% in 2005; 5% in 2006; and now 7.5% in 2007, a total of 29.5% in four years. By the end of 2007, TMLT’s rate reductions, since 2004 will amount to nearly $139 million and returned dividends of 25% will amount to nearly $45 million. Since the passage of Prop 12 and medical liability reform of 2003, TMLT policyholders will have realized cumulative savings of over $180 million.</p>
<p>Non-meritorious claims intake is down as a result of the medical liability reform achievements in 2003. TMLT believes the legal environment will continue to improve as long as 2003 tort reform measures remain in effect.</p>
<p>Because of TMLT’s recent earnings and strong surplus position, physician policyholders can share in the organization’s success in the form of rate reductions and dividends.</p>
<p>Case closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/comment-page-1#comment-75745</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-texas-stampede-of-physicians.html#comment-75745</guid>
		<description>&quot;Given that the number of new physicians has not increased on a per capita basis in Texas, attributing it to anything other than population growth is risky.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;No, it is not risky.  In fact it follows logically.  Physicians must enter Texas legally to practice and as the article states there is a long credentialing backlog.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Texas&#039; residents do not have to enter Texas legally, and the last time I checked there was no wait to be admitted on any of Texas&#039; borders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Given that the number of new physicians has not increased on a per capita basis in Texas, attributing it to anything other than population growth is risky.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, it is not risky.  In fact it follows logically.  Physicians must enter Texas legally to practice and as the article states there is a long credentialing backlog.</p>
<p>Texas&#8217; residents do not have to enter Texas legally, and the last time I checked there was no wait to be admitted on any of Texas&#8217; borders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/06/texas-stampede-of-physicians.html/comment-page-1#comment-75742</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/06/the-texas-stampede-of-physicians.html#comment-75742</guid>
		<description>Given that the number of new physicians has not increased on a per capita basis in Texas, attributing it to anything other than population growth is risky.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Interesting that Tennessee was cited, since it has also experienced new insurers and rate decreases, and it doesn&#039;t have a cap:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.dayontorts.com/tort-reform-svmic-lowers-rates.html#discussion&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Doh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that the number of new physicians has not increased on a per capita basis in Texas, attributing it to anything other than population growth is risky.</p>
<p>Interesting that Tennessee was cited, since it has also experienced new insurers and rate decreases, and it doesn&#8217;t have a cap:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dayontorts.com/tort-reform-svmic-lowers-rates.html#discussion" rel="nofollow">http://www.dayontorts.com/tort-reform-svmic-lowers-rates.html#discussion</a></p>
<p>Doh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
