The New Yorker on Sicko

June 27, 2007

It calls the film “almost superfluous“:

After the early tales of the system’s failure, “Sicko” becomes feeble, even inane. A recent poll shows that a majority of Americans not only favor a national health service but are willing to pay higher taxes for it. In that case, wouldn’t it have made sense for Moore to find out what features of universal care in other countries could be adapted to America? Instead of sorting through any of this, Moore and his crew go from place to place””to Canada, England, and France, as well as Cuba””and, at every stop, he pulls the same silly stunt of pretending to be astonished that health care is free. How much do people pay here in France? Nothing? You’ve got to be kidding. But isn’t everyone taxed to death to pay for health care? Well, here’s a nice, two-income French couple who have a great apartment and collect sand from the deserts of the world. Not only haven’t they been impoverished by taxation; they travel. And so on.



Related posts:

  1. Sicko: Real health care in Cuba
  2. Sicko one-sided? It can’t be . . .
  3. The myth of Cuban health care
  4. Sicko available for free
  5. Sicko: Do I hear bingo?
  6. Michael Moore’s Sicko
  7. Sicko sequel: LiTIGO


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Chris Benoit and steroid rage

Next post: Poland struggling with a baby boom

Site Meter