Avandia: WSJ cries politics

June 19, 2007

Health Care Renewal on the WSJ’s editorial on Nissen and Avandia:

So the Wall Street Journal’s new whirl has kept the Avandia spin cycle merrily revolving. This spin cycle continues to distract from what I think, in my humble opinion, are really the major questions.

The first question is clinical: what are the benefits and harms of rosiglitazone as a treatment of Type 2 diabetes, and therefore for which patients under what circumstances should this drug be used?

The second question is about policy: what barriers, if any, have prevented physicians and patients from getting the best possible answer to the first question, and what can be done about them?



Related posts:

  1. Does Avandia cause heart attacks, and why the RECORD study is important
  2. Avandia and heart attacks
  3. Avandia: The RECORD study
  4. "Should I keep taking Avandia?"
  5. Avandia: "Watch the science, not the politics"
  6. Avandia, MI, and cardiac death
  7. Avandia and politics


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Sicko: Socialism in a capitalist society?

Next post: Single-payer fanaticism

Site Meter