<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surgery with a 90-day warranty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/05/surgery-with-90-day-warranty.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/05/surgery-with-90-day-warranty.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:50:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/05/surgery-with-90-day-warranty.html/comment-page-1#comment-75174</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/05/surgery-with-a-90-day-warranty.html#comment-75174</guid>
		<description>What they also don&#039;t tell you is that in substantial number of cases, the insurer is Geisinger itself.  In other words, they&#039;ve always eaten the bill on unexpected outcomes,complications, re-do&#039;s etc in a large number of their patients anyway.  thier staff doc&#039;s are salaried,so it doesn&#039;t matter (from a monetary prespective)if the patient needs aditional work in the global period.  Work is work is work,and it doesn&#039;t affect the doc&#039;s bottom line.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I suspect what they&#039;re really trying to do is set this as a precedent so that the (non-Geisinger staff)doctors who accept their insurance product, and occasionally find themselves having to re-operate on, or re-admit a patient will then have to eat their bills for service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they also don&#8217;t tell you is that in substantial number of cases, the insurer is Geisinger itself.  In other words, they&#8217;ve always eaten the bill on unexpected outcomes,complications, re-do&#8217;s etc in a large number of their patients anyway.  thier staff doc&#8217;s are salaried,so it doesn&#8217;t matter (from a monetary prespective)if the patient needs aditional work in the global period.  Work is work is work,and it doesn&#8217;t affect the doc&#8217;s bottom line.</p>
<p>I suspect what they&#8217;re really trying to do is set this as a precedent so that the (non-Geisinger staff)doctors who accept their insurance product, and occasionally find themselves having to re-operate on, or re-admit a patient will then have to eat their bills for service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/05/surgery-with-90-day-warranty.html/comment-page-1#comment-75165</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/05/surgery-with-a-90-day-warranty.html#comment-75165</guid>
		<description>90 days of postoperative care is generally included in the global surgical fee for most major procedures, especially under Medicare. They are advertising as a &quot;warranty&quot; what has almost always been required. The only exceptions are unanticipated second procedures and staged operations that must be done within the 90-day global period of the initial operation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think this is a silly and pointless gimmick. People don&#039;t choose hospitals based on a 90-day warranty. They choose based on where their doctor happens to work or where their insurance coverage dictates where they must go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>90 days of postoperative care is generally included in the global surgical fee for most major procedures, especially under Medicare. They are advertising as a &#8220;warranty&#8221; what has almost always been required. The only exceptions are unanticipated second procedures and staged operations that must be done within the 90-day global period of the initial operation.</p>
<p>I think this is a silly and pointless gimmick. People don&#8217;t choose hospitals based on a 90-day warranty. They choose based on where their doctor happens to work or where their insurance coverage dictates where they must go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
