Big Pharma, data-mining, and the AMA

May 22, 2007

Some are saying the AMA’s “opt-out” clause for physician prescribing patterns is too subtle. With millions of dollars at stake, the AMA is caught in the middle.



Related posts:

  1. Data-mining for drug risks
  2. A federal judge in bed with Big Pharma
  3. Do drug companies and the pharma industry deserve to be villains?
  4. DTC advertising = money wasted?
  5. Pharma tries victimize physicians
  6. Who are more likely to inappropriate prescribe antibiotics?
  7. Who makes the most from Big Pharma?


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 6 comments }

1 Anonymous May 22, 2007 at 10:56 am

Can anyone tell me how I would go about ‘opting out’?

2 Anonymous May 22, 2007 at 12:53 pm

I’d love to, but it’s too subtle to explain.

3 BMS May 22, 2007 at 4:46 pm

While many doctors seem ignorant of these issues, it matters to patients. Prescription data is used to market the newest blockbuster drugs that patients may not need or worse – Vioxx anyone? At least some doctors like Dr. Thakkar (see Wash Post piece) are opposing this practice. Check out http://npalliance.org/Pages/protecting_prescription_privacy

4 Anonymous May 22, 2007 at 8:17 pm

Does the AMA only give out information about doctors who are members of the AMA? I am not a member so does that mean I don’t need to opt out?

5 Rich, MD May 22, 2007 at 8:36 pm

Even if you are not a member, the AMA collects and sells data about you. You can opt out at the AMA web site.

6 Paige Hatcher May 23, 2007 at 10:18 pm

AMA caught in the middle! Last I checked they are supposed to be working for us.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Man slept through a gunshot wound in his head

Next post: Medication refills

Site Meter