Steffie Woolhandler: Bias taints her study

April 18, 2007

She wrote that health savings accounts costs more for women due to more preventive exam needs. However, she is a single-payer fanatic, with obvious bias to her study – which is not even available for public viewing. (via Health Care BS)



Related posts:

  1. Single-payer bias
  2. Media bias against the evidence
  3. The media’s bias against the harms of cancer screening
  4. Medical bankruptcy a myth?
  5. The media and their pro-screening bias
  6. Full disclosure and bias
  7. Does a physician’s bias color the informed consent discussion?


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 comment }

1 Anonymous April 21, 2007 at 10:59 am

Anytime I see any opinion hound use the word “punish” in reference to the fact that some people have more costs imposed by the natural exigencies of life, instead of in reference to actual punishment–an imposition of cost or pain in retaliation for unwanted behavior, then I just cross them off my reading list and move on.

I guess she thinks men are severely punished by social security and Medicare because they pay a lot more taxes and don’t live as long. Whites are punished by the skin block manufactorers because they have to pay more to protect themselves from sunburn than darker people. Obese people are punished by clothing sellers. Dumb people, who can’t help being dumb, are punished by the capitalist labor market. Neurotic people are likewise punished by a labor market that pays more for more stressful jobs–and those who can bear them.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Virginia Tech: A call for gun control?

Next post: Hospital rankings: JD Power vs US News

Site Meter