With P4P on the horizon, over 80% of physicians feel this way:
“I have 10 to 15 patients whom I would have to fire,” one respondent said. “The poor, unmotivated, obese and noncompliant would all have to find new physicians.”
Related posts:
- Malpractice rate hikes and high-risk pregnancies
- Did Facebook lead to health insurance denial?
- When fat doctors talk to obese patients
- Electronic health records: A "high-risk venture" for physicians
- When patients dictate care
- Poll: Should obese patients pay more for ambulance transport to the hospital?
- Does using Plavix with a proton pump inhibitor raise the risk of death in heart attack patients?
KevinMD.com on Facebook
{ 1 comment }
What bothers me about P4P is that it attacks the problem from the wrong angle. Looks to me that the end result will be insurance companies and doctors each trying to game the system to their advantage.
Short office visits, over reliance on emergency rooms to provide care, treatment divided up among a host of providers most of whom don’t really talk to each other and high patient turnover all seem to me to add up to little or no effective feedback.
With all of the above, how can you have P4P that is at all meaningful? All it look like to me is an attempt to close the loop between the doctor and the insurance company, not between the patient and the doctor.
Comments on this entry are closed.