Comments on: Malpractice juries http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/04/malpractice-juries.html medical blog Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:15:05 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/04/malpractice-juries.html/comment-page-1#comment-74751 Anonymous Tue, 08 May 2007 04:32:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/04/malpractice-juries.html#comment-74751 recently i went through a 5 day trial. we prevailed 12-0. above comment is accurate. recently i went through a 5 day trial. we prevailed 12-0. above comment is accurate.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/04/malpractice-juries.html/comment-page-1#comment-74305 Anonymous Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:59:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/04/malpractice-juries.html#comment-74305 To an extent he's right, but that goes to all walks of life. Businesspeople prefer to work with people they like, for example. You'll work with an asshole, but only if you don't have a choice. To an extent he’s right, but that goes to all walks of life. Businesspeople prefer to work with people they like, for example. You’ll work with an asshole, but only if you don’t have a choice.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/04/malpractice-juries.html/comment-page-1#comment-74304 Anonymous Thu, 26 Apr 2007 16:53:00 +0000 http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/04/malpractice-juries.html#comment-74304 This is no different than any other form of civil litigation that ends in a jury trial. Juries find a way to side with the people that they like. One word of advise, and no this is not an attempt to sound condescending, is for those such that fall into the category of clinicians, high ranking academicians, etc - leave your pompous self-important attitudes at home. It is difficult going from an environment where your every musing is worshiped as if nectar from the gods and your every footstep is preceded with rose petals to an environment where your word alone is not sufficient. Juries hate those that come across as arrogant douchebags (whether it be clinicians, academics, etc). The best view to portray is one of being polite, professorial and knowledgeable. If the case has no merit then good luck in your defense.<br/><br/>~Criminallopath~ This is no different than any other form of civil litigation that ends in a jury trial. Juries find a way to side with the people that they like. One word of advise, and no this is not an attempt to sound condescending, is for those such that fall into the category of clinicians, high ranking academicians, etc – leave your pompous self-important attitudes at home. It is difficult going from an environment where your every musing is worshiped as if nectar from the gods and your every footstep is preceded with rose petals to an environment where your word alone is not sufficient. Juries hate those that come across as arrogant douchebags (whether it be clinicians, academics, etc). The best view to portray is one of being polite, professorial and knowledgeable. If the case has no merit then good luck in your defense.

~Criminallopath~

]]>