A six-year waiting list in single-payer Canada

March 1, 2007

Some are living in debilitating pain waiting to see a spine surgeon. Unacceptable.



Related posts:

  1. Single-payer already exists in the US
  2. Waiting a year for skull surgery
  3. Single payer truths, from Ontario’s Ministry of Health
  4. Single-payer in Sweden: A cautionary tale
  5. Single-payer: "Time to be really scared"
  6. Single-payer: Good for relieving anxiety
  7. Waiting for the biopsy result is as stressful as being told you have cancer


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 8 comments }

1 Elliott March 1, 2007 at 12:04 pm

That was a 100% anecdotal article. Glad to see that Canadians uphold the fine traditions of journalism.

2 Couz March 1, 2007 at 5:41 pm

You can always count on the media to sensationalize a story. And if it’s against socialized health care, you can always count on the sensationalism being posted here.

3 Anonymous March 1, 2007 at 8:06 pm

Hum, My friend taht live sin Calgary had back surgery not long ago. She didn’t sayone ward about having to wait anything close to 6 years..

Kevin, thats laughable and its satire!

4 Anonymous March 1, 2007 at 10:23 pm

Does it matter? Does back surgery really help? Most the dope addicts in my ER have had previous back surgery.

5 Anonymous March 2, 2007 at 12:51 am

What crap. I saw my neurologist within a week and my neurosurgeon booked my surgery within the week.
This wait list thing is a figment.
If you took any trouble to research you would find out wait times are becoming a thing of the past.
Any person waiting a year for a consult? Their family doc just never got around to asking for one.

6 anne March 2, 2007 at 12:54 am

That’s all Kevin does. Posts anecdotal accounts and tries to say it is the norm for the system.

If anyone were to actually check out the stats on wait times, they are no where near those numbers. Not even close. Of course, who wants to look at actual statistics? Not Kevin.

7 Anonymous March 2, 2007 at 1:07 am

This article explains how the media is distorting facts and skewing perceptions of the Canadian healthcare system. It could very easily apply to this “blog” as well.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2000/0007.marmorsul.html

8 vincent March 2, 2007 at 1:24 pm

Dear Anonymous,

Your link was an article about the handling of a flu breakout. This is completely different from standard levels of care. While I abhor the use of anectdotes to support a position, we must accept these testimonials at their face value. These are the problems that occur in Canada. The increased wait times for oncologists, orthopedists, radiology exams compared to the US is well-documented and indisputable.

I would ask one simple question that should make this clear to you. If the Canadian system works so well then
a)why did the government outlaw private clinics?
b)why did the supreme court of Canada overturn this totalitarian law recently after the government was sued for limiting access to care.

Get your facts straight!

Vincent

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: The right to dental care?

Next post: The new king of drug abuse

Site Meter