<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Searching for a snowman in a blizzard&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/03/searching-for-snowman-in-blizzard.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/03/searching-for-snowman-in-blizzard.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:50:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Happyman</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/03/searching-for-snowman-in-blizzard.html/comment-page-1#comment-73032</link>
		<dc:creator>Happyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/03/searching-for-a-snowman-in-a-blizzard.html#comment-73032</guid>
		<description>In my very congested area of practice, where there are like 500 doctors in all subspecialties within a mile radius, across the street from a medium-sized (300-bed) community hospital, NO private radiology facility will do mammograms - they always advise me to send patients for screening mammos to the hospital radiology dept.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;there, the wait is 6 months unless i call and whine on the phone.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;i think the solution has to be increased reimbursements (i&#039;ve heard they get something like $30 to read a mammogram, still not too different from a follow-up office visit for me, but i think most&#039;d agree it&#039;s still low)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my very congested area of practice, where there are like 500 doctors in all subspecialties within a mile radius, across the street from a medium-sized (300-bed) community hospital, NO private radiology facility will do mammograms &#8211; they always advise me to send patients for screening mammos to the hospital radiology dept.</p>
<p>there, the wait is 6 months unless i call and whine on the phone.</p>
<p>i think the solution has to be increased reimbursements (i&#8217;ve heard they get something like $30 to read a mammogram, still not too different from a follow-up office visit for me, but i think most&#8217;d agree it&#8217;s still low)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/03/searching-for-snowman-in-blizzard.html/comment-page-1#comment-73011</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/03/searching-for-a-snowman-in-a-blizzard.html#comment-73011</guid>
		<description>The point is - there are far fewer radiologists reading mammograms out there and given the aging population, more radiologists are needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is &#8211; there are far fewer radiologists reading mammograms out there and given the aging population, more radiologists are needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/03/searching-for-snowman-in-blizzard.html/comment-page-1#comment-73001</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/03/searching-for-a-snowman-in-a-blizzard.html#comment-73001</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;n a seven-year period ending in 2002, PIAA members spent almost $200 million on breast cancer malpractice cases. That was $30 million more than was spent during the previous six years.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;THat&#039;s good then, isn&#039;t it?  They spent (200-30)/6 = $28M a year from 1989-1995 and then 200/7 = $28M from 1995-2002.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Plus they are missing out on inflation, making the previous number even better, probably by about 10%.  So malpractice costs have gone down?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>n a seven-year period ending in 2002, PIAA members spent almost $200 million on breast cancer malpractice cases. That was $30 million more than was spent during the previous six years.</i></p>
<p>THat&#8217;s good then, isn&#8217;t it?  They spent (200-30)/6 = $28M a year from 1989-1995 and then 200/7 = $28M from 1995-2002.</p>
<p>Plus they are missing out on inflation, making the previous number even better, probably by about 10%.  So malpractice costs have gone down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
