President Bush and narcissistic personality disorder

March 1, 2007

Armchair psychiatrists debate whether his decisions are being influenced by this personality disorder.



Related posts:

  1. Darth Vader and personality disorder
  2. Are personality disorders really that common?
  3. When political discourse is like borderline personality disorder
  4. Is racism a psychiatric disorder?
  5. President Bush, lauded by The New York Times? On health care?
  6. A woman says her bipolar disorder made her buy a car
  7. Seasonal affective disorder


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 8 comments }

1 Anonymous March 1, 2007 at 3:06 pm

Kevin, the Daily Kos is not a reputable source for anything.

2 Blog, MD March 1, 2007 at 3:42 pm

There was a terrific (I thought) article in New York Magazine entitled Bush’s Mind: Analyzing the President. It’s a fascinating and insightful read.

3 Anonymous March 1, 2007 at 4:23 pm

Since when is stupid a personality disorder. W is no Chauncy Gardener

4 Anonymous March 1, 2007 at 7:46 pm

I think it a misuse of psychiatric diagnostic nomenclature to use it with regard to public figures outside the context of medical treatment. And the AMA’s code of medical ethics supports that. That does not of course negate the utility of discussing the character traits of public figures and how they affect their behavior and therefore the nation. The man is stubborn. Is stubborn bad? Well it depends on whether you agree with the person or not, and on how it turns out. Lincoln’s stubborness saved the union. Hitler’s destroyed Germany.

5 Greg P March 1, 2007 at 9:02 pm

In my view this is strictly a matter of intelligence.
Although we do not necessarily want to have a president with the highest IQ, there is a certain level of intelligence that is simply necessary to understand the complexity of the job.
One of the Republican tenets, shown by the experience of having a President with Alzheimers while in office, is that the key to the Presidency is having the right group of advisors to “guide” the President through the important decisions.
What we now have is a President guided by a Rasputin sort of character with an agenda clearly not in the best interests of the country.

6 Darrell March 1, 2007 at 9:24 pm

A majority of voters disagreed with you in the 2004 election, greg p, as I do now.

7 jones March 1, 2007 at 10:21 pm

In 10- 15 years when social security falters and islamic terrorists have their way because the invested in defeat democrats get their way GW is suddenly going to look much smarter.

8 Magazine_Lover March 6, 2007 at 5:34 am

It’s a great thing that you have one of the best providers of magazine subscriptions as you sponsor :)

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Patient wait times vs time spent with the physician

Next post: Insurer restrictions on bariatric care

Site Meter