<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ok, we&#8217;ve identified the problem in health care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/03/ok-weve-identified-problem-in-health.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/03/ok-weve-identified-problem-in-health.html</link>
	<description>medical blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:15:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/03/ok-weve-identified-problem-in-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-73071</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/03/ok-weve-identified-the-problem-in-health-care.html#comment-73071</guid>
		<description>5:23,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Truth and Ditto&#039;s.  I am glad that I am not the only one that understands that picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5:23,</p>
<p>Truth and Ditto&#8217;s.  I am glad that I am not the only one that understands that picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/03/ok-weve-identified-problem-in-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-73063</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/03/ok-weve-identified-the-problem-in-health-care.html#comment-73063</guid>
		<description>Whoa.  Brutally honest, but true.  What the last poster said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa.  Brutally honest, but true.  What the last poster said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2007/03/ok-weve-identified-problem-in-health.html/comment-page-1#comment-73060</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clients.emmense.com/kevinmd/2007/03/ok-weve-identified-the-problem-in-health-care.html#comment-73060</guid>
		<description>The article that the paragraph is drawn from above makes a lot of sense--except that it doesn&#039;t accord with reality.  I worked at one of those big clinics--over 200 docs of every specialty.  It owned it&#039;s own HMO and was capitated for the care with all the docs talking and working together.  Good quality of care.  But cheap?  Well, at first it seemed more efficient, but by the late 90&#039;s it nearly went under in red ink, had to  dissolve the partnership, sell the clinic to the hospital, and sell the HMO.   &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Everyone persists in the fantasy that we will somehow have our cake and eat it too, but the fact is, Americans are healthcare gluttons and every advance in technology only exacerbates that.  Even all the ranting about improved efficiencies to be had from EMR is so much hogwash.  It makes the medical record department more efficient, but when systems are created to monitor and improve care, what happens is that all kinds of tests and treatments called far in the guidelines that are not currently being provided are identified, people are called in and provided the care they were neglecting.  That means more cost.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And no, you don&#039;t save money for the system by keeping people healthier.  The people who save money for the system are the ones genetically destined to be healthy who just stay away from the clinic.  Good care keeps sick people alive longer which costs more money.  The unpopular truth is that the most efficient healthcare system is the one that let the weak and sick die with as little care as possible.  So lets beware of always calling for more efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article that the paragraph is drawn from above makes a lot of sense&#8211;except that it doesn&#8217;t accord with reality.  I worked at one of those big clinics&#8211;over 200 docs of every specialty.  It owned it&#8217;s own HMO and was capitated for the care with all the docs talking and working together.  Good quality of care.  But cheap?  Well, at first it seemed more efficient, but by the late 90&#8217;s it nearly went under in red ink, had to  dissolve the partnership, sell the clinic to the hospital, and sell the HMO.   </p>
<p>Everyone persists in the fantasy that we will somehow have our cake and eat it too, but the fact is, Americans are healthcare gluttons and every advance in technology only exacerbates that.  Even all the ranting about improved efficiencies to be had from EMR is so much hogwash.  It makes the medical record department more efficient, but when systems are created to monitor and improve care, what happens is that all kinds of tests and treatments called far in the guidelines that are not currently being provided are identified, people are called in and provided the care they were neglecting.  That means more cost.  </p>
<p>And no, you don&#8217;t save money for the system by keeping people healthier.  The people who save money for the system are the ones genetically destined to be healthy who just stay away from the clinic.  Good care keeps sick people alive longer which costs more money.  The unpopular truth is that the most efficient healthcare system is the one that let the weak and sick die with as little care as possible.  So lets beware of always calling for more efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
