Gadolinium under fire

March 19, 2007

Gadolinium is an agent commonly used prior to MRIs. Problems are starting to emerge in those with kidney disease. Lawyers are on to it:

Walker, 71, said he suffers from a rare condition called nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, in which skin turns hard and joints become inflexible.

He believes he got the condition when he was injected last year at University Hospitals with a prescription drug containing the metal gadolinium before having magnetic resonance imaging.

His lawyers filed a lawsuit last week in U.S. District Court against the makers of the drug, Optimark. The lawsuit comes a few months after the Food and Drug Administration announced an investigation into a possible link between nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and drugs used in MRIs, including Optimark, when injected into patients with kidney ailments.

His lawyers believe their lawsuit is among the first of its kind in the country.



Related posts:

  1. Non-medical news of the day
  2. The wrong doctor sued, and still paying the price
  3. Another approach to health care costs: Ban advertising
  4. Cap trial lawyer pay
  5. Madison County: Days as a "judicial hellhole" over?
  6. How the courts are harming pain management
  7. Did propofol, or Diprivan, kill Michael Jackson?


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 3 comments }

1 Diora March 19, 2007 at 2:49 pm

This should be written under “risks of testing” – for those who think there is no harm in unnecessary testing.

Obviously when a test is really needed, the benefit may well justify the risk. But if it was a “defensive” test, this is unnecessary harm.

This is a generic comment – I don’t know anything about this drug or the magnitude of this risk.

2 Anonymous March 19, 2007 at 6:23 pm

Or even if it is a risk. Anyone want to wait for data?

Most medical tests are done, and drugs given, when people are old and sick, which is when they, well, get sick. It does not necessarily follow that the former caused the latter.

3 Diora March 19, 2007 at 9:49 pm

You have a point.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: HIPAA vs the public good

Next post: Inflating the US infant mortality rate

Site Meter