The NEJM speculates in an editorial:
Ultimately, the payment of primary care physicians might be a blend of fee for service, monthly fees for practices serving as patient-centered medical homes, and additional bonuses for meeting quality and efficiency performance goals. Primary care physicians could instead be paid a monthly fee per patient (adjusted for the case mix), along with a bonus for performance. Such payment methods are more likely to be acceptable to physicians than is global capitation, because they do not put physicians at risk for services provided by others, and they contain only positive performance bonuses.
Related posts:
- Why not a down payment for primary care, and problems with the medical home?
- The future of primary care: Optimistic or misguided?
- A bleak primary care future
- Where’s the money to better pay primary care doctors going to come from?
- Does pay-for-performance work, and will it improve health care quality or patient outcomes?
- Health care reform is "dead in the water" without primary care
- Males = specialists, females = primary care physicians
KevinMD.com on Facebook
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe







Comments on this entry are closed.