Only a matter of time before this would happen:
Swapceinski acknowledged at least one doctor’s office made multiple, glowing postings in an effort to boost ratings.
Related posts:
- My take: CPOE, VistA, doctor rating websites
- The fallacy of doctor rating websites
- Fixing doctor rating sites
- Lawyer rating websites
- Difficulties in an insurer doctor-rating website
- Zagats going into the doctor rating business
- It’s tough rating doctors
KevinMD.com on Facebook
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe







{ 6 comments }
I find it interesting that people seem to be ignoring the fact that most of the ratings are overwhelmingly positive. I can understand the frustration when they get bad ratings and have no way of defending themselves, but on the flip side, it seems as if most people are eager to praise a good doctor. And that’s what most people are doing.
I did the first posting re my surgeon, and it was indeed ‘glowing’, because he was simply wonderful. The worrisome thing to me about those sites, though, is that people can make untrue statements anonymously, statements that are without factual foundation. I wouldn’t like it if that could be done to me!
This is to all the doctors,that get a bad rating/s,if you know you are are a good doctor,and your doing your very best,don’t worry what others say,the world is full of liars,and there is no getting past that,you can’t make a person not to lie.Best wishes.
There are truly some BAD Doctors out there and we need places to be able to let others know they should check out this Doc before they decide to go to them. It at least lets people be warned that there is possibly a bad Dr. and he needs investigating further so they can make an informed decision.
I have rated several Dr’s and all but 1 have been positive.
We need more sites available to the public.
I would not trust any site,where ANYONE can make false ratings.
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire (usually). I’d beware of a doctor who has multiple neg comments
Comments on this entry are closed.