The controversy over organ donations after cardiac death

March 19, 2007

This growing trend is troubling some bioethicists:

Some doctors and bioethicists, however, say the practice raises the disturbing specter of transplant surgeons preying on dying patients for their organs, possibly pressuring doctors and families to discontinue treatment, adversely affecting donors’ care in their final days and even hastening their deaths.

(via White Coat Notes)



Related posts:

  1. Poll: Should we loosen the restrictions on organ donation?
  2. Avandia, MI, and cardiac death
  3. Do lacrosse players have a higher rate of sudden cardiac death?
  4. Organ donation incentive
  5. Women donating their eggs, is it easy money?
  6. Should you have to "opt out" of organ donation?
  7. How did Michael Jackson die, and the medicine behind sudden cardiac death


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 1 comment }

1 Anonymous March 20, 2007 at 4:17 pm

It’s more macabre than the article describes.

At St. Louis Children’s Hospital the protocol for the ‘non heart beating donor’ is this:

-Despite the name, start with a patient whose heart is very much still beating.
-This patient is alive by virtue of some measurable brain function and a natural circulation is expected to expire soon despite ongoing critical care
-If their organs meet criteria for donation and the family consents then
-The surgical team assembles in the OR
-The patient is transported from the ICU to the OR
-When everyone is ready, the skin is prepped for surgery and the harvest team prepared, the life support (usually a breathing machine) is turned off
-If the patient’s heart stops within 30 minutes the surgeons cuts.
-If the heart does not stop then the patient is returned to the ICU to await death. The ventilator may or may not be turned back on.

Under the former rules of brain death criteria at least the patient was dead. The brain dead exam is quite specific and the person is unequivocably all dead when the brain is dead.

But this new procedure is to take advantage of organs from the patient who is not dead yet, but probably will be dead soon. Successful harvest depends upon knowning exactly when the patient will become all dead and thus the incentive to actively schedule the death by pulling the plug after the patient is ready for harvest.

All of the anesthesiologists in our group have refused to participate in this practice. We’ve even agreed that we would not alter schedules for regular patients to accomodate this practice. Since we don’t control the facility otherwise we cannot stop the Critical Care physicians, lead by Allan Doctor (yes, his real name) from this practice.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Surprise! MGH gets busted

Next post: HIPAA vs the public good

Site Meter