A scientist lets hookworms burrow into him to test a hypothesis

February 6, 2007

Dedicated, or crazy:

When Professor David Pritchard wanted to test the effects of parasites on humans, he had to apply to the Ethics Committee.

They refused him the go-ahead because they weren’t confident it was safe. So there was only one thing for it: he volunteered himself.

This involved putting 50 hookworms on a plaster, then sticking it to his arm so they could burrow under his skin and travel to his gut. They would live in his body for five weeks.



Related posts:

  1. HIPAA lets a wanted criminal go
  2. How should Oprah handle medical issues?
  3. Quit smoking, or no surgery
  4. "It’s always easier to order a test than to have a conversation about why the harms of the test outweigh the potential benefits"
  5. Should there be a law requiring patients to receive copies of their test results?
  6. Routine screening test recommendations, and how newspapers often get it wrong
  7. How to save the NHS "billions"


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 2 comments }

1 RJS February 6, 2007 at 3:54 pm

He could have just read this:

” This is my personal account of curing my asthma and hayfever by deliberately infesting myself with the intestinal parasite hookworm.

It isn’t for the faint hearted and for some should not be read while eating.

It involves a great deal of research, a trip to Cameroon and a lot of barefoot walking in open air latrines in west Africa.

If you have asthma, or know someone who has asthma (or for that matter Crohn’s disease, IBD or colitis) and are suffering badly you owe it to yourself to consider this approach. Because although it sounds strange and is repellant it is founded on sound science and it has one other virtue.

It worked.”

Heh.

2 Anonymous February 6, 2007 at 5:47 pm

They were not quite clear on whether the ethics committee approved the self experimentation.
To publish research, all human research must be cleared by an ethics committee before commencing work. No exception for self experimentation exists. His colleagues who also participated in the self-experiment would be the very ones the ethics committee would wish to protect because their subordinate work relationship to the principal investigator calls in question the whole voluntariness of it all.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Welcome to the world of alternative medical income

Next post: How John Edwards can make amends with the physician community

Site Meter