Public perception: "That’s why doctors have malpractice insurance . . . It won’t hurt him at all!"

February 11, 2007

A physician overhears some perceptions on medical malpractice while in the sauna.

Off topic, if Dr. iBear is listening, I can’t view your blog on Mozilla – the browser of choice for many.



Related posts:

  1. The choice between malpractice and insurance fraud
  2. Are doctors are hurt financially by single-payer health care?
  3. Withholding antibiotics and public perception
  4. Physicians in Opera: Reflection of Medical History & Public Perception
  5. Educating the public on the malpractice crisis
  6. In malpractice trials, doctors are presumed guilty and must prove innocence
  7. Is the public plan option supported by doctors?


KevinMD.com on Facebook


  Follow on Twitter   Subscribe



{ 4 comments }

1 Anonymous February 11, 2007 at 10:39 pm

That’s why liability insurance is never, ever mentioned during a trial. Of any kind.

However, it’s a long way from a guy in a sauna talking about it to a insurance company paying it. A looooonnnnngggg way.

2 Anonymous February 11, 2007 at 11:13 pm

I mean a personal injury trial.

3 Anonymous March 15, 2007 at 11:30 am

Actually, about half the states do permit mention of insurance at trial.

And, of course, a statement by a plaintiff that he is really after the insurance money might be an exception to the general rule in the other half.

4 Anonymous March 15, 2007 at 1:00 pm

Can this be a ground for counter-suit ?

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Quickie medical clinics: Are their days numbered?

Next post: "Any ologist will do"

Site Meter