Revised anti-smoking guidelines are imminent. Is quitting cold-turkey getting the shaft?
Now debate is growing about that evidence, and about who should be entrusted to interpret it. Some public-health officials say industry-funded doctors are ignoring other studies that suggest cold turkey is just as effective or even superior to nicotine patches and other pharmaceuticals over the long run, not to mention cheaper . . .. . . The Public Health Service, part of the Department of Health and Human Services, issued guidelines in 2000 calling for smokers to use nicotine patches, gums and other pharmaceutical aids to quit, with a few exceptions such as pregnant women. Dr. Fiore, a University of Wisconsin professor of medicine, headed the 18-member panel that created those guidelines. He and at least eight others on it had ties to the makers of stop-smoking products.
Related posts:
- Benefit of DTC ads?
- Are warnings for nicotine replacement therapies going overboard?
- The anti-smoking poster-boy
- Ban smoking and watch the rate of heart attacks drop
- Tell patients to stop smoking, or get sued
- Anti-smoking ads use a crying child, is it too much?
- Why do anti-smoking ads backfire?
 
Follow on Twitter  
Subscribe







{ 1 comment }
Completely anecdotal, but a few people I know who quit successfully did it cold turkey.
Comments on this entry are closed.